0
votes

An Opinion Must Be Backed Up With Facts

posted November 8, 2006 - 2:19pm
An Opinion Must Be Backed Up With Facts

How many times has someone defended their opinion to you by stating "that's just my opinion"? Do we as a people need to back up the claims and opinions we have with solid, verifiable facts, or is conjecture and feelings alone good enough? No, an opinion and a feeling are two different things. While most feelings do in fact stem from some sort of outside stimuli, they are vague, less easily defined than an opinion. People who think they do not need to defend their opinion with facts are wrong.

An opinion is worthless if it does not come from reality. If i believed that gnomes lived at the center of the earth and were plotting to one day rise up and kill us all, it would do no one any good for me to voice this feeling. It isn't an opinion, it's a feeling, a feeling of fear and paranoid that, while it might have been caused by some sort of outward action or reaction, it is not based on varifiable fact. If I could show that there really were gnomes living beneath the earth, and if I could show that they meant us ill, then that would support my opinion. Otherwise, what good would this opinion do?

This is doubly true for writers, especially those writers who post on this website. If you write an article as a statement of opinion, then you need to state within the article a set of facts that back that opinion up. You must strive to refute what any potential debater might say before he or she has the chance to say it. That is good writing, and it indicates a lucidity of opinion. Without this, you are not writing about an opinion, but only about your feelings. Nothing is so mealy-mouthed as an expression of opinion that is based on nothing more than how you feel. There is a place for articles of "feeling" but they are generally not political in nature, more often than not, they deal with every day life, kittens infested with maggots, things of that nature. A political statement needs to be grounded in fact.

A person should never have an opinion that isn't based on reality. There are so many people in this world who blithely parrot other people's opinions without investing any energy into researching the issue or finding more out about it. Thus begins the cult of personality whereby some figurehead can spout his or her viewpoint with no worry about reality and others will defend this point of view, sometimes to the death, never realizing that what they believe in was a lie. This is why it's of the utmost importance to think for yourselves, spend the time to find out what the facts are about an issue and how you feel about those facts, and decide for yourselves where you stand on the issue. Otherwise, your opinion isn't a valid one. And please don't whine that someone doesn't respect your opinion. If you can't justify the things that you say with solid evidence than it is you who does not respect your opinion.


Tags:

Comments

i don't really have a

i don't really have a problem with outlandish posts. (i don't have a "problem" w/ any posts, really, i'm just trying to offer a bit of advice.) what i don't like is a post that doesn't have much meat to it, or that has a point but doesn't bother to prove the point it's trying to make. if you're going to go out of your way to make a statement, a political one in particular, there should be facts to back it up. no we don't need footnotes, annotations, etc etc, but if someone is trying to make a point, it seems like a good idea to try to prove it as well. (self-evident points not included.) the other thing is that some of these articles seem very lazy. a list of good movies/bands/chicken casserole dishes without any explanation of "why" they are good, or even what they are (as in, this is a movie about...) just looks sloppy to me. but to each his own i suppose. and durn it i LIKE nuts in my brownies!

I have a pet peeve too. The

I have a pet peeve too. The phrase "we as people." What else would we be, toasters? I think the fact that we are people can be safely assumed. Oh, and nuts in my brownies. I hate them too. "Thank you for driving carefully through the villiage." That's what the sign says.

With you all the way, Mob-Luv.

Antonia Dwells

Antonia Dwells

Well, mobius, I just think

Well, mobius, I just think you have to remember that this isn't a debate club, even though all of us try our hardest to make it one. There are so many different opinions and writing styles here, so you have to be able to filter them out in your own head. Things that seem outlandish to you may seem perfectly normal to the person writing it. There's nothing wrong with questioning people or requesting more facts, but some people are just here to write and not debate. Some people will try to debate, but can't. Others only want to debate and don't care much for writing. But no matter what is written, none of it should "bother" anyone. We're all just regular people expressing ourselves through writing. If anyone here is continually bothered by the content in the xombytes or comments, they should really reconsider being a member in this type of community.

true..

i guess i just don't really treat xomba that way. i have a blog and see no reason to consider xomba as a "home away from home" as it were. i try not to post anything that i wouldn't want published. this is more like my deviantart account than my livejournal. am i being too rigid about it? i came here to hone my writing skills, not simply slack off. i guess i can't hold everyone else to the same types of standards that i'm (attempting to) hold myself to. (yes, i haven't wholely succeeded, but at least i can say that i tried.) i don't know. i guess what this really is is just a pet peeve. i spent a few years in a debate club in high school, it always bothers me when someone makes a statement (particularly an outlandish one) that they can't argue, successfully or otherwise. it must just be me...

Mobius, I understand what

Mobius, I understand what you're trying to get at here. Many people don't articulate why they hold a certain opinion, and that's ok. Some people just like to write out their thoughts or express their opinion, but not necessarily as a persuasive argument. If the object of your article is to convince your readers to believe a certain position that you have, then facts probably are important. Simply expressing an opinion doesn't require them. I think you are just confusing an opinion about a subject with an "opinion" (as in scientific). Just remember that this is a blog site. Most of us are here to just write and express our thoughts in public. Everyone is more than welcome to do additional research on their own if they feel it's needed. I just don't think it's necessary in many situations that a writer MUST provide facts in their articles. Just my opinion, of course.

you're absolutely right.

you're absolutely right. (and to think, some of us actually CAN capitulate when wrong. amazing.) my point of all of this is simply that if you can't back up what you're saying, maybe you need to rethink your opinion. (you meaning people in general.) i could have stated that better than i did in this article, but i don't think that the basic point i tried to make was a poor one. too often people don't even know why they think the things that they do. without a strong argument, an opinion becomes fairly worthless. (an opinion that doesn't involve a matter of taste.) let's put aside the political here: if you're going to review a movie, you'd better be able to say why you thought it was good or bad. and substantiate that opinion in some way. that's all that i was trying to say. sorry that i haven't stated this opinion (*cough*) correctly.

Actually, mobius, what you

Actually, mobius, what you just wrote about George Bush could be considered libel. So, if those are the "opinions" you're going to write about, you may want to be more careful. The last time I checked, people could express their opinions about their views or feelings, and I don't remember hearing anything about an unwritten rule that facts needed to be presented in order to have an opinion. If you want to ask for facts, that's fine. That doesn't mean anyone HAS to give them to you on demand. Just because you disagree with their opinion, it doesn't mean they need to give you some sort of scientific data to back up every word they say. Maybe you should look up the definition of "opinion."

heh

i stated within the article that not every type of article needs to follow this guideline. all i've done is emphasis one of the basic tenets of mla formatting, that if you are going to write an "opinion piece," then you need to have facts to back up that opinion. but if this isn't the case, then i'll write an article about how george w. bush just had sex with a goat at a recent press conference. don't need to back this stuff up w/ facts!

So Mobius, can I see some

So Mobius, can I see some evidence and fact to back up your little opinion on opinions here? Or is this just how you tend to "Feel" about things? Because if it's just how you feel, then, well, you know.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member