0
votes

On Being Both "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Choice"

posted November 21, 2008 - 1:52pm
On Being Both "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Choice"

In a world that is consistently perceived in black and white, at least from a political stand point, it is often frustrating to have conversations with those who can't think outside such a limited spectrum. A case in point is the issue of abortion. Why is it immediately assumed you have to either pro-life or pro-choice? Quite frankly, I believe this is an entirely ridiculous assumption. A person's personal beliefs needn't get in the way of understanding that what is right for them, isn't necessarily right for everyone.

I am not just speculating, or pulling this argument out of thin air. This comes from personal conversations with women who have shared this opinion with me. As a man, I'm not really qualified to express my own opinions on this subject, anyway. I don't have a womb, will never get pregnant, and can never comprehend the experience of carrying a fetus inside my body -- or aborting one. It's just completely out of my realm of understanding.

In a perfect world, everyone would be responsible when it came to sexual relations. They wouldn't engage in unprotected sex, not would they use abortion as a method of birth control. Of course, in a perfect world, there would also be no rape or incest. I'd be curious to know how many of the anti-abortion crowd would be willing to adopt an infant who was the spawn of siblings.

No, we do not reside in a perfect world. My idea of a perfection in this life would be to see people live their life according to the principles and beliefs and leave others to live their's as they see fit. Until a fetus is a living being outside a woman's body, it is nobody's concern but the person to whom it's attached.


Not a member of Xomba? Join now to comment on this article


Tags:

Comments

@MJ Dako.--'Non-Consensual Conception' ... Different 'Peter Pan'

"I want to jump off this overpass, but I don't want to land!" lol ---Uncle MythMan (http://www.geocities.com/jmythh2k5) & the Xombies Help You with Money, Love, God etc. Use Your Evolved Mind & GET PAID BY SAVING THE DIALOG STARTERS!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

@jdubh.--Look at the Sources of Abortion- & Expression-Arguments

The abortion-one stems from a combination of man's desire to 'be as good as his words-from-God/FSM' and man's desire to 'police his dominion and make IT "good as his words".' ... And after eating that 'cake'; the man wishes to be again known as 'one who HAS "cake",' but realizes the 'cake' one is to be said to have CAN NO LONGER BE that 'cake' once the 'cake' is eaten ... ---Uncle MythMan (http://www.geocities.com/jmythh2k5) & the Xombies Help You with Money, Love, God etc. Use Your Evolved Mind & GET PAID BY SAVING THE DIALOG STARTERS!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

Beginning of life definition

I agree that the issue of abortion is going to go on for quite a while until some "authority" can decide when life begins or for that matter at what stage of life is it considered a human being. I am a controversy. MJ

Marriage is another topic

Marriage is another topic altogether...and it's been defined for quite some time. Defining when "life" begins needs to start with the people who would know best - scientists and medical doctors. Once they can determine it - as a collective community - we'd have something to debate in the political arena as far as laws are concerned. I actually don't think religion has a role in that process. Religion, by definition, relies not on scientific inquiry, but on faith Deciding abortion issues isn't really practical until we can at least figure out that much. I actually don't think religion has a role in the defining process. Religion, by definition, relies not on scientific inquiry, but on faith. Faith is not based on science or reason and a reliance on faith is wholly incompatible with logical debate. Who is Publius? Join Xomba and get PAID to write - CLICK HERE!

Definitions do not come easy

In our civilization, deciding and defining controversial issues belong to the political, legal, and religious sects, not the scientific. I mean think about it, look at the process of defining marriage in California. I am a controversy. MJ

The abortion debate will

The abortion debate will probably never be settled or have a chance at being settled until one thing is cleared up: When does life begin according to science/medicine and the law? All the debates in the world will not satisfy either side unless the scientific/medical community reaches agreement about when life begins and that beginning is recognized by law. We can argue in perpetuity in the meantime, but it will not settle a damn thing. Does anyone think it's about time that a species and civilization that is as "advanced" as ours should be able to come up with a definition as remedial as that? What's the point of arguing "pro-life" or "pro-choice" if nobody can clearly decide/define when life begins? Who is Publius? Join Xomba and get PAID to write - CLICK HERE!

The story wasn't complete

If this story was in modern day America, the so-called lover of life pro-life mother would have gladly sacrificed her son by allowing him to be shipped off to die in some Godforsaken piece of desert in the Middle East. That is the inherent hypocrisy of many pro-lifers. They oppose the "killing" of the baby in the womb, but they gleefully support the investment of eighteen years in the child's life before giving the child to the State to be killed in "service" to the State while murdering the sons and daughters of people living in other countries. Either a person is pro-fundamental preservation of life or he/she is not. The moniker "pro-life" is not an accurate description of the belief system. JOIN XOMBA IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO ADD!

Prochoice or Prolife

As a man who has been recognized for his wisdom throughout history and society. King Solomon posed a question to 2 women who claimed the same child. Cut the child in half and they could each have possesion of 1 half of the child. The real mother declined. The false mother accepted. The real mother was prolife and could not accept the fate of her child. The false mother was prochoice and could have accepted either fate. You vs. Society

the word is delusional

the word is delusional (Xomba even has a spell checker to help you). Anyway, what's your point? Money for your Thoughts - join now OWO-HP

You vs Society

I am a controversy. As much as I feel abortion is dependent on the circumstances and the person, using abortion as a "gender-getter" is not a reason I personally accept. At the same time, it is your life, you have talked it over with hubby, the decision is joint and we do live in a free country with, u-humm - freedoms? So, ultimately the choice is yours. MJ

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member