Big Carbon threatens Fermilab with Extinction -- Not just the Polar Bear.
posted December 23, 2007 - 1:41am
Image: U S Treasury, treas.gov
Who are the True Enemies? Do they appear to be friends? (See the mirror)
The True Enemies of a Solution to Global Warming : Our Bank's "Parent Banks."
To a very high degree, it is in the mirror again. We are our enemy. Perhaps not all of us. The cartel of banks are the overlords of nations and economies. For one purpose. And it has nothing to do with species survival. Gedanken: if aliens showed up and made an offer for the Earth, it would likely be sold. Of course, it does not even belong to us, so that ought to tell you something. . . it is not owned by these kinds of earthly entities though they would have you believe it to be so owned.
This guy was one of the sellers of bad paper to the Chinese. It was in a former job. Now it looks like there are lots of ways to make that bad paper better, but the real power is in the Federal Reserve.
Image: treas.gov, Henry Paulson, Jr. Secretary.
You really have to understand that the globe-straddling corporations owned by the families with interconnecting bloodlines in the international banks are most of the problem with global warming. There are vast sums of "money "and Banks are themselves, for both long- and short-sighted profit, causing most of the interference with the means of reaching a solution. Most of this is "old" money leveraged into power in the US via the 1933 F. D. Roosevelt declaration of bankruptcy of the U. S.
The groundwork for this bankruptcy condition and takeover had been laid by bankers meeting in the period just before the US entered WWI. Woodrow Wilson helped further internationalize and broaden the funding and money situation by his support of the doomed League of Nations. Make no mistake: The US is a bankrupt nation and the mortgage upon it is owned by the international banking cartel. Learn more about this from the postings presented here:
http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html
I ask you, especially the young to learn or recall the warnings Eisenhower made about the dangers of the military-industrial complex. This is also a recognition of the money supporting and exploiting those who fear no safety and confusing the ideas with security. But mostly, it is to make money. And the Banks finance it. The Iraq War is a money pit. So is the "war" on "terrarh. . ."
Those entities "opposing" or mediating the resistance to a necessary solution to anthropogenic global warming are, through their "ownership" of the US Federal Reserve, these entities:
Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
From a monetary standpoint it makes little difference to a bank which side you are on. The bank makes money on leveraged increase in numbers. More people to exploit.
Oh, you think "they" have the interest of the species at heart? Not really. Only to the degree that the rest of mankind might be used to make a "profit" for them. It takes convincing the borrower that it is a win-win. It can't work if the population stops growing, where the futures loose value. But it is part of the continuing effort to skim and manipulate, for profit, the entire species, and on a unified global scale.
Profit is not made by all elements in "the business" relationship. Those "profits" have to come from somewhere. If there is a profit, there is a loss; make no mistake -- profit does involve loss. Who loses? That is pretty obvious; we all lose -- that is, you may not recognize where this lucre is coming from, but it is the loss of potential in the environment, losses to the environment that creates the win-win illusion; frogs and polar bears do not speak back, we only see their emaciation or food acquisition difficulties (starvation), or, as they become extinct and vanish, we do not see them at all.
For most of the history of "civilization," (What a terrible word) the loss has been to the rest of the planet's species, that environment humans and bankers keep 'apart' from themselves -- the environmental commons. Various religions give humans a special place at the head of the table of life on the planet. This becomes another tool, in some hands, for exploitation. That head of the table justification is at best an illusion. However, the Banking Cartel uses this illusion to justify their economic control over the species, and the other life forms. (Intelligence is a matter of degree -- more than kind, it is like being smart and simultaneously stupid.)
You must realize these "bankers" are not "climate scientists" but are only merchants of "old" money, their fundamental creed extending back in time several thousand years to the Babylonian Era and the Babylonian invention of the ideas of Profit and Banking via the labor and efforts of others. Many credit the concept of "profit" and "interest" on symbolic quantities (Money) as the mover of worlds. You might want to rethink this idea, and possibly recognize that it is the result of an exploitation of our common environment, and also an exploitation of the human population to provide a "top" to the pyramid -- occupied by whom. These bankers for the most part do not understand what they are doing to the planet -- or that they serve a god of destruction. That is not to say it can't be changed to a new godhead. Environmental profit, sustenance not "sustainability" of the status quo. The most of the species do not know they are facing extinction at human hands. (By accident, Gaia may engineer the pandemic solution -- but already for many life forms that is too late.)
What happens if the Commons is over-exploited for profit by a group?
What happens if your waste products are excreted into the environment in such quantities that they can't be "recycled" into more harmless future resources?
---Many of you may have ideas of eMergy and a beginning grasp of the unification ideas of the late Howard T Odum and other ecologists who are describing the entire complex ecology of the planet in energy terms including the complex values and relations within the environment and the energies emergent as short-term and long-term energy interactions with sequestrations a part of the order of things. The field of ecology is perhaps a richer field than High Energy Physics -- and actually contains HEP within the continuum of organic relationships though it is a broad idea soup. It might be easiest and best grasped as a hierarchy from the fundamental to the complex. This continuum contains many many punctuated equilibriums that form and become boundary conditions and huge legacy boundaries between interacting components. Though the entire construct can be seen as a synthetic and useful description of the soup of reality, it is much more powerful than the simplistic bankers models of the world, and the ecologies and systems examined as ecologies are much better described -- because the are actually "real." Principles and "laws and relationships" that occur at a "fundamental level" pervade the hierarchy through boundaries. Few Bankers will grasp this, or will recognize how it constrains the possible solutions to the disaster they have largely funded, and largely caused -- and I apologize for this digression.
Hmmmm? See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergy
(This is a fair conceptualization of much of the unification possible in a "real" system with entropy and other thermodynamic recognitions as opposed to economic, where the actual physics and social sciences are NOT recognized and joined. A new system of banking is in order. But the old accountants would not like it, and will not, with the harsh dose of "real" it yields.)
--------------
That "solution" would and should have included a world where the polar bear might still live wild 100 years from now.
But, in all honestly, we are way beyond that possible point now -- well before 100 years has passed.
IF EVERY HUMAN DIED . . .
Would the life of the planet be aided? (Likely, it would, if you quantify the survival rate.)
If every human succumbed to the pandemic version of avian flu in one month, the Polar Bear would still be dead. If every human died -- the human species eradicated from Earth -- Polar Bear still dies.
The coming warming is COMING, and unless the CO2 is sucked out of the air and sequestered, there will be no more polar sea ice adapted fauna, no more ringed seals and no more Polar Bear. Because of the amount of CO2 we have already placed aloft and have no means of removing -- polar bear, ringed seal, birds and critters we do not even know, become extinct from our CO2 legacy. They are dead, extinct, gone -- because of us, not "nature"; because of us, not a "natural" progression or even such a thing as an asteroid/comet impact -- but as a result of our exploitation and damage of the "natural" world around us. Who is funding this, who is making this possible? Who profits? What (the hell) is Profit compared to survival of millions of species interlinked on a world? Taking more of the world than is good for it and for us has been profit for whom? Destroying the Commons, the Ocean, the Air, and with it our common climate, for whom?
Fermilab's new programs, its new neutrino programs, its new lifeblood, has been drained as though the transfusion to give new life to knowledge was simply directed to a place where much of it will be exploded into uselessness.
Fermilab could close by 2015. Permanently. I hope that not to happen. Oil and other Big Carbon entities and their parent banks are the reason; taking the money from the U. S. Treasury through the money-changers (Jesus tried to drive from the temple) -- to finance a war to secure vast sources of C to combine with our global commons O2 to make the invisible warming poison CO2, by burning this C into the commons of the air poisoning the place we all live. Remember the trumped-up reasons and flat-out lies to "remove" Saddam Hussein. Colin Powell certainly does, and probably does not sit well now with the truth -- compared to his version. Did he know when he did what he did -- what he was doing?
Image:whitehouse.gov
Most of you won't remember that Saddam Hussein "tried" to offer sympathy to the United States for the trauma of 911 and that genuine sympathy was buried and turned away by the Bush neocon directed jackboots in this administration and a media controlled by those involved. Of course Saddam was a monster, but what monsters do we have now to counter more like him -- we surely have our own, don't we?
This kind of reminds one of the fascist era of those who supported Hitler and the Nazi regimes who manipulated the German population and Europe into a money making war. (Yes, through lend lease and the Marshall Plan, we reconstructed, a "larger" less feudal system -- where banking could move back to digesting the work of millions for a few.)
So how does that lead to the extinction of American High Energy Physics (HEP) and Fermilab?
We have one of the highest orders of human intellectual activity being eliminated as G W Bush, and "Shadow Director" Chaney and minions, orchestrating the weakening and destruction of the United States of America by theft and by reducing its economic position in the world -- to secure some assets in oil for a few buddies.
What "did in" HEP? It was the short-term illusion that we need oil and huge amounts of profit could be made from it -- so yes, Fermilab suffers from the war for oil. And if that isn't motive enough, the concept of fear needs to be popular, so there we need the "war on" terror. We can't afford to know or learn the nature of matter. Besides, the world is only a few thousand years old! Ask the Republican right-wing.
Image:Fermilab.gov
You can see this building is unique. It has to do with symmetry, though Robert R Wilson has another piece of artwork called "broken symmetry" visible from ground level, near the entrance to the facility.
Interactive Image: Google.com
Even from satellite, you can see this building is distinctive. It is Fermilab's Robert Wilson Hall. Shrink it down so you can see the Lake to the north.
President Bush wants to cut Fermilab funds by 17%. It is in Obama's home state. Could this be just another one of the Bush Administration's manipulations of federal science for political gain?
Imagine a nearly 20% cut in your take-home paycheck. Could you make the ends meet? Who wins? If you have to give up something to make ends meet? The bankers win no matter what you do. And maybe it is the military contractors that win, good buddies that they are.
These Images: Fermilab, fnal.gov
Robert R Wilson Hall. This is an interesting photograph. It is close to or at dusk, and in the reflection in the water, the longer wavelengths of the red side warning and the top marking lights show up well -- where they do not in the non-reflected image. Do you know why? Note too, that the sky reflected in the water is also a darker blue. We are actually looking south ward, since you see an over exposed moon at about first quarter, or a little way beyond first quarter. The reddish sky glow in the lower windows of the building indicate the sun has recently set, but the sunset reflection is not from the location on the horizon where the sun just set, but from a place further south of west. . . Nice photograph! Credit Fermilab.gov or fnal.gov
More than 200 layoffs will happen here for want of a war.
Image: fnal.gov
The Illinois Congressional delegation is talking strategy.
You know, there is some big deal physics being done in New York too. . .
One thing that Bush's DOE wanted was ITER -- (the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor.) But in the last day or so Congress backed away and out of the ITER funding. ITER scientists are lamenting the removal of America's 9% contribution to the tokamak being built in France. They say they will be slowed but not stopped. That funding removal, is, I think a good idea. But if we back out there we need to fund something here. The $149 million ITER funding would easily carry the $62 million slashed by the administration from Fermilab, with enough left over to start the anti-Big-Carbon program outlined by the late Robert Bussard for Inertial Electrodynamic Fusion. (IEF)
You can't do High Energy Physics without the people and minds and equipment.
If anyone is laid off in the coming weeks and they are smart people, I would suggest looking into the IEF concepts and finishing up what Bussard knew needed to be made bullet proof for our future instead of oil, which destroys our future. One such item is an ion gun, possibly best made with a strong ceramic insulator. Such a boron ion gun is needed to strip as many electrons as possible from the boron atom to leave a strongly positively charged nucleus that can be fired toward a deep deep negative electron core where it is accelerated to the kinetic energies high voltage dictates and fuse with an ionized hydrogen atom (a proton) which has also been fired into the plasma soup at the center of the electron well. Good high voltage devices are needed.
But Congress needs to fund it. Or just go out on your own. High schoolers can also do this!
Here is hoping Fermilab gets a reprieve from Congress -- and the $62 million or so deficit in funding for Fermilab can be replaced. I already know where it ought to come from.

Comments
Post new comment