Bioelectriciy better than ethanol for transportation?
posted May 8, 2009 - 8:06amBioelectriciy better than ethanol for transportation?
![]()
Image: Wikipedia
Brazil does Sugarcane. For real.
A timely report appears in Sciencexpress today. 8 May 2009
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/1168885v1.pdf
The report deals with the energy trade-offs of efficiency, emissions, food costs in the comparison of transportation energy.
"Greater Transportation Energy and GHG Offsets from Bioelectricity Than Ethanol"
By: J. E. Campbell, D. B. Lobell, C. B. Field
The report attempts to quantify more clearly the use of land for production of biofuel.
The report shows that ethanol does not perform as well as bioelectric transportation methods for the same area units of land use.
The authors comparisons detail that bioelectricity from battery electric vehicles is more efficient than using the biomass converted to biofuel (ethanol) and burned in the internal combustion engine vehicles. The authors are ignoring any predictions on which of the two systems, battery electric or combustion biofuels will reach maturity first.
![]()
Image: Wikipedia -- corn, land use, young shoots
Both pathways have potential -- and also have infrastructure demands. Using the electrical grid instead of the liquid biofuel distribution system has some advantages in bypassing the conversion of biomass to ethanol as opposed to direct biomass combustion, or joint incineration with coal. In neither case is any practical Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS)scenario fully developed. though it is given token reference in the report.
The report has current mechanisms analyzed, with bioelectricity yielding 81% MORE Kilometers per land unit, and 108% more emission offsets than land used for cellulosic ethenol.
The authors use of coal co-burning for electricity production does not balance well with the nonexistence of evaluated CCS mechanisms although they cleary state electrical advantage.
![]()
Switchgrass
image: wikipedia
![]()
SWITCHGRASS
Images-- Wikipedia
Using biofuels to produce electricity does not overload the carbon emissions since the Carbon in the biostock (Corn, Switchgrass, Willows, sugarcane ) is removed from the air by the plant in the first place to essentially reach "carbon-emission" neutrality.
Co-burning with coal DOES NOT reach carbon emission neutrality.
Read the report at Sciencexpress.

Comments
bio-electricity
Join Xomba Here
Brazil, long ago ended its thurst for oil - With Sugar Cane
Visit: "Along The Merry Way..." - Good Reading Every Day
You can't help but note the direct combustion of biomass
Biomass
Join Xomba Get PAID
Legitimate Online Income Methods
Post new comment