0
votes

Brain Wave Entrainment

posted September 16, 2006 - 6:41pm
Brain Wave Entrainment

 Technology has become so advanced we as citizens do not have an understanding about brain maps, space technology via satellite transmitting nor about through-the-wall surveillance.  We better learn before we become prisoners in a political fall-out! Brain Wave Entrainment: Technology has become so advanced we as citizens do not have an understanding about brain maps, space technology via satellite transmitting nor about through-the-wall surveillance. We better learn before we become prisoners in a political fall-out!

As concerned citizens, I know you will want to help unravel the remifications of the secrecy of George W. Bush and his associates. I have found some medical terminology I am feeling the public must become responsible for because the medical techniques can be intertwined with military secrets and torture.

A medical journal abstract quote:

-----
Pharmaco-EEG maps of neuroleptics, antidepressants, tranquilizers, hypnotics, psychostimulants and nootropics/cognition-enhancing drugs will be described. Methodological problems, as well as the relationships
between acute and chronic drug effects, alterations in normal subjects and patients, CNS effects and therapeutic efficacy will be discussed. Imaging of drug effects on the regional brain electrical activity of healthy subjects by means of EEG tomography such as low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) has been used for identifying brain areas predominantly involved in psychopharmacological action.

(EEG topography and tomography (LORETA) in the classification and evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of psychotropic drugs. By Saletu B; Anderer P; Saletu-Zyhlarz GM. Clinical EEG And Neuroscience: Official Journal Of The EEG And Clinical Neuroscience Society (ENCS) [Clin EEG Neurosci] 2006 Apr; Vol. 37 (2), pp. 66-80.)
-----

Throughout history our government has sought to keep military secrets that have gone unchecked. Quotes from a historical book reveals how the military surveillance has continued to operate in secret:

-----
The public generally accepted the surveillance structure created during World War II. Many people assumed that individual rights would be infringed or suspended in time of crisis. Fed by the national surge at the beginning of the war, reinforced by the red scare at the end, this acceptance did not encourage the critical analysis of military activities during time of war. Within most of the intelligence agencies, those few critics who did complain were considered enemies to be outwitted.

During 1963, President John Kennedy ordered a secret report on the total number of government employees engaged in intelligence and their annual expenditures. One analyst of the intelligence establishment affirmed that an estimate of sixty thousand people and $2.5 billion was on the low side. Much of the intelligence was foreign, growing out of United States involvement in Vietnam, but there was a parallel expansion of domestic intelligence during the Kennedy administration. Its reliance on force abroad was accompanied by a growing reliance on force at home.

Under President Richard Nixon, surveillance went on. Nixons new civilian chiefs tried to tighten the central control of covert investigations and to curb the activities of agents, but they continued to allow army agents to infiltrate civilian political movements. Agents made 1,200 spot reports a month during 1969. Any pretense at restraint was abandoned in the October and November antiwar moratoriums during which army agents took to the streets to report on marches, rallies, and prayer vigils. Computers kept immense data banks on civilian protesters and civilian political activity. An elaborate network exchanged information with other
agencies, including the FBI, police, and campus security officers. The expansion met the short-range needs of a bureaucracy without policy, with no comprehensive analysis of the armys domestic intelligence needs or its role in civilian law enforcement.

The Senate committee, known as the Church committee for its head Democrat Frank Church, was a bipartisan committee that included the powerful Republican Barry Goldwater. In the fall of 1975 the Church committee held public hearings that exposed abuses by the intelligence community; in April 1976 it published a final report that documented these abuses and called for stricter executive and congressional oversight. The House Select Committee on Intelligence recommended that the Defense Intelligence Agency, which now oversaw all military surveillance, be prohibited from any intelligence operations in the United States. In May 1977, Secretary of Defense Harold Brown ordered that military agencies keep their operations within the law and report any violations at once.

(Jensen, Joan M. (1991). Army surveillance in America, 1775-1980. New Haven: Yale University Press.)
-----

The elected officials taking part in such an out-of-control conspiracy to harm American's as in today's rule by President Bush, have become co-conspirators. Our leaders are not on the same map as the rest of society! This rule that intimidates us, impoverishes us, attempts to destroy or control our lives, imprisons us and threatens anyone who dares to speak against this Dictator called George Bush and company, must create in us a precedence to suppress his outrageous acts against our better judgements. I feel that we have gone far enough, with this one cabal that so destroys everyone and every country his company comes into contact with and as free, sovereign citizens we have forgotten our duty to uphold the Constitution. To have let the country be taken to extremes in so many wrong directions and in such secrecy it is up to us to solve these massive problems and help each other to find out where there are conspiracies to
harm us!

Many of our well-meaning leaders that have spoken against the dire consequences of our world-wide actions against the human race are under the same threat as we are, not understanding the great strides already being made in pharmaceuticals. Weaponry creating medical illness as well as illness being identified as serious mental illnesses, can easily be found on the internet to be modified, track and secretly assault and assassinate citizens! I have done the research and it made sense, that so much illness cannot yet be solved along with the rising cost of medical health care most people cannot afford. These electronic weapons, some are of the electromagnetic variety and called "EM" for short, can be found in a variety of "black market" technologies, are sometimes called "influence technology" or "high tech weapons".

There is a group of citizens, from around the world who are now talking with members of Congress, to tell them about how they have been targeted with secret, military-style weapons. We are not told about these secret assaults because of the massive litigation people around the world conceivable could force if the massive destruction were truthfully exposed.

Many scientists have held their silence due to their colleagues being assassinated. A scientist admits to this.

I, for one, am working all I can to unravel the mysteries of how health care, military weaponry and political campaigns have been fought or lost, possibly using secret methods to alter the brain wave functioning of humans.

Learning more about medical technology, military weaponry and political history, lining them them up in a timeframe and asking ourselves what could have been done to have our history be shaped this way could have ramifications upon our history. We may find that after some thought we may have to revise history and reflect about how secret weapons technology has possibly made our decisions by brain wave influence.



Comments

part of this was to publius, part to antonia

This is a part of the Undiscovered Country idea I am citing. Hamilton as PUBLIUS believes that the constitution can be amended and corrected by Article V, and tries to discount the idea that the "rulers" can't be constrained, and himself cites the "peremptory force" of Article V. (Amendments! One method tried, the other, a part of our laws, denied.) I have actual faith, despite your climate grasp, that you may understand this. So I hope you do. Read my xombyte, see the websites www.cc2.org and www.article5.org and hope the Court hears the case and decides for the rule of law. Read on. == excerpt from Federalist #85 ---- In opposition to the probability of subsequent amendments, it has been urged that the persons delegated to the administration of the national government will always be disinclined to yield up any portion of the authority of which they were once possessed. For my own part I acknowledge a thorough conviction that any amendments which may, upon mature consideration, be thought useful, will be applicable to the organization of the government, not to the mass of its powers; and on this account alone, I think there is no weight in the observation just stated. I also think there is little weight in it on another account. The intrinsic difficulty of governing THIRTEEN STATES at any rate, independent of calculations upon an ordinary degree of public spirit and integrity, will, in my opinion constantly impose on the national rulers the necessity of a spirit of accommodation to the reasonable expectations of their constituents. But there is yet a further consideration, which proves beyond the possibility of a doubt, that the observation is futile. It is this that the national rulers, whenever nine States concur, will have no option upon the subject. By the fifth article of the plan, the Congres will be obliged "on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the States [which at present amount to nine], to call a convention for proposing amendments, which shall be valid, to all intents and purposes, as part of the Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the States, or by conventions in three fourths thereof." The words of this article are peremptory. The Congress "shall call a convention." Nothing in this particular is left to the discretion of that body. And of consequence, all the declamation about the disinclination to a change vanishes in air. Nor however difficult it may be supposed to unite two thirds or three fourths of the State legislatures, in amendments which may affect local interests, can there be any room to apprehend any such difficulty in a union on points which are merely relative to the general liberty or security of the people. We may safely rely on the disposition of the State legislatures to erect barriers against the encroachments of the national authority. If the foregoing argument is a fallacy, certain it is that I am myself deceived by it, for it is, in my conception, one of those rare instances in which a political truth can be brought to the test of a mathematical demonstration. Those who see the matter in the same light with me, however zealous they may be for amendments, must agree in the propriety of a previous adoption, as the most direct road to their own object. ===== end of excerpt Publius, the States have together opposed some mandates of the centralized power of the federal government and have called over 500 times for an Article V Convention. Congress has denied the people that relief. I say it is time to have the relief. Past time. Way past time. Before 1808 the idea was to not allow changes in representation of the people. Two senators helps keep the representation of small sovereign states on a par with the large populous states. Keep thinking and writing. When I first saw the lawsuit Walker v. Congress, I did not get it. I do now. les

Secrecy

Yes, thank you Antonia. The secrecy of this government is our downfall. We need open and honest government and citizen's involvement and oversight! My other sites: www.lulu.com/electrowell www.electmagnetic.blogspot.com www.angelfire.com/al4/custody

To what part of #85 are you

To what part of #85 are you referring? "And the unwarrantable concealments and misrepresentations, which have been in various ways practised to keep the truth from the public eye, are of a nature to demand the reprobation of all honest men." Is that what you had in mind? And what about article 5? Where it refers to "the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article"? What exactly are you asking me?

And this.

news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060917/ap_on_re_mi_ea/in_american_hands

Antonia Dwells

The Wart?!

Have you seen a painting or an accurate sculpting of Publicola? One that you can direct us to? I have not heard or seen the wart described. But . . . then, it occurs to me . . . Antonia, in the Medusa persona did you actually meet with Publicola? Is this wart thing your first hand knowledge? What color was the Wart, fleshy, dark, black or bloody brown? Hamilton, Madison and Jay -- have you read Federalist #85? Or Article V? What are your thoughts on those writings and on the Publius republican idea of a government? Just curious.

Publicola had a wart on the tip of his nose.

Antonia Dwells

Antonia Dwells

Hamilton, Madison, or Jay - what pretense is yours, or which?

Hi Publius. What caused you to choose and use the federalist's moniker? Is it a John Roberts or Sam Alito affectation or affliction? There may be more going on between the ears there than has been seen or suggested by the brain rigidization and entrainment -- but what? You write expressively if not passionately about some political issues. Publius via Hamilton first believed in a King's Rule. As a shared part of Publius, he was more interested in a Kinglike Institution, a strong centralized government. In Federalist #85, he pointed out that the states could restrain the King-like powers of the strong central government by using Article V's peremptory status. This is the Undiscovered Country we the people have been prevented from using or exploring to fix the things wrong with the Federalist approach and the corrupted strong central government. Invoking Article V might be the best path to restore the constitutional rule-of-law-concept. However, I would suspect you may have been under the influence of a brain entrainment technology if you can support Kathrine Harris. If not you are probably safe! I understand the money she is squandering on the race is simply the reward from the 2000 payoff. She should have dropped out and spent the money on a body perk, but heck, who knows what braintrainment can do to one? A year or so back, an acquaintence of mine, one Gregory Benford (physicist, writer, scientist) wrote a short SF story about a new weapon that is not at all unfeasible, and is certainly being researched. It is not that far off the mark from the ideas "sue" is describing. Realize it is possibly less than a generation to the point where thoughts can be stimulated by remote electrostimulation of particular brain regions. The particular Greg was using as a short story idea was a neural or nerve whip. It causes the nerves to send messages to the brain that the area affected is burning. Kind of like being toasted in hell for a bit, then you crawl away with the memory of the pain still in your nerves and brain. It could change some peoples behavior. It is to be used as a non-lethal weapon, like tear gas. And if and when developed and deployed affects not the brain alone, but the entire nervouse system. Like phased array radars, it is directable, not just passive reception of a device looking for faint returns from a microwave equivalent flashbulb. This stuff is not that far off, and the reading of brainwaves by sensors has promise for quadraplegics and such as stephen hawking for communicating what goes on in there (brain) and how to use those goings on to manipulate the external world to live usefully or productively. Keep it up Publius. :)

It happened to me!

Oh my God. I had no idea this was going on. But now that you mention it, I did become ill during the last election in '04. I was so sick that I couldn't even go out and vote. It was really weird, since I usually never get sick in the fall. It was more than just a sickness though. It felt like my brain was pulsating non-stop for almost two days. I went to the doctor and they couldn't pinpoint the problem...they were totally bewildered. Now it all makes perfect sense. George Bush was trying to kill me so that I couldn't vote for him. Damn you, George Bush! DAMN YOU!!

I am enjoying the post, and it parallels concerns I have.

Suggestion: I do not always do it, but should. Use a spelling checker. I liked your post I support Article V. The case Walker v. Members of Congress is on appeal to the Supreme Court. see www.cc2.org and www.article5.org shrub is trying to keep from being impeached. I hope he fails and does time.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member