0
votes

Executive Government Wastes Lives Like That of Army-Nurse Maria Inez Ortiz

posted July 20, 2007 - 2:03pm
Executive Government Wastes Lives Like That of Army-Nurse Maria Inez Ortiz

‡‡‡‡

Maria Made Me Cry

By Joel S. Hirschhorn

18 July, 2007
Countercurrents.org

I unexpectedly found myself crying over the Iraq war as I read the obituary of Capt. Maria Ines Ortiz, a highly praised Army nurse. What I read broke my heart. The story of this remarkable woman and her tragic, pointless killing in Iraq had so much more power than the endless statistics that have numbed our emotions and fed our anger about Bush’s Iraq War.

Maria was just 40 years old. She volunteered for duty in Iraq, eager to do her part. She wanted to take care of soldiers. She was the first Army nurse killed in combat since the Vietnam War.

Everyone who ever worked with Maria adored and respected her. She was one of those truly exceptional people who transcended her professional status with loving care for those she nursed and worked with.

Maria was killed on July 10 in the Green Zone in Baghdad. She was caught outside by a barrage of mortar shells and killed by shrapnel.

Before going to Iraq last fall she was the chief nurse at the Kirk U.S. Army Health Clinic in Aberdeen, Maryland. Many people there broke down in tears when the clinic commander called everyone together to tell them Maria was another casualty of the Iraq War. Renee Smith who had worked with Maria described her as the “jewel of the clinic.” “Her work wasn’t finished until everybody was cared for,” said Smith.

Maria had also served at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Medical Command officials are considering naming a building or clinic in her name to honor her memory.

Wendy Schuler, another co-worker at Aberdeen, had sent Maria an email, asking if she needed anything. All Maria wanted was Christmas decorations so she could brighten up the halls at the hospital where she worked. Her colleagues there held a memorial service for her. They talked about how Maria had touched their lives.

Maria started her Army career as an enlisted solder with the Reserve in Puerto Rico in 1991. She became active duty in 1993 and was commissioned an officer in 1999, the year she received her nursing masters degree from the University of Puerto Rico. Dead in 2007.

Upon returning from Iraq, Maria was to marry Juan Casiano, an Army veteran who had guided her career. He said “She touched everyone's lives and everything about her was positive. She always carried a smile. I saw in her what everyone else sees, a beautiful person who brings joy to everyone she touches. There wasn’t anything negative about that woman.”

Maria is also survived by her parents and four sisters. Her father had also served in the Army and said, “She always said to me ‘daddy, I am going to serve 30 years in the army.’” Maria only made it halfway.

Maria will be buried at Arlington National Cemetery.

Maria was just 40 years old with so much more living, loving and service ahead of her. Bush is guilty of her crimina lly negligent homicide.

I don’t know what Maria thought of the Iraq War. But her death has done more than anything else to make me despise what our disgraceful, delusional and dumb President George W. Bush has done. It will take a long, long time for our nation to heal from the wounds that Bush has viciously and arrogantly inflicted on us.

Maria should not have died from shrapnel in Iraq. And neither should have thousands and thousands of other Americans died and become terribly wounded in Iraq. For what? To keep all the lies of Bush alive until, eventually and inevitably, we leave Iraq, defeated and with even more dead and wounded soldiers?

By then Bush will be back in Texas, disgraced, delusional and dumb as ever. And many, many people will still shed tears when they remember Maria and ask themselves: Why ?

And why, I ask, is there any hesitation by any sane member of Congress about impeaching Bush?

[Joel S. Hirschhorn is a founder of Friends of the Article V Convention at www.foavc.org and author of Delusional Democracy, www.delusionaldemocracy.com.]

This was sent to me by Dusty, a friend of mine from Care2.com.

I think I can tell you why we don't impeach Bush: Because Bush–though he may be a leading-checkpoint of the problem (i.e. where 'the buck' stops)–is not the whole problem!

The whole problem is the system that brought him up. That is where the 'terrorism' actually gains its force, where 'money' buys the big guns, big guns buy one more 'money,' more 'money' buys bigger guns ... and on-and-on with people giving up their worth for fear of bigger gunfire.



Comments

 You might've red in the last

 You might've red in the last two paragraphs that I'm not blaming Dubya either! He was the 'front-piece' (oh, the word for 'the pretty-lady statue on the fore-mast of a boat') of the administration that built the war.

I also mentioned that Dubya was a long-long-long way from being in any kind of power to be "to blame" for anything!

'Blaming' (which 'pointing fingers' is sometimes part-of) enables one to find the source of a problem, helping one see a) whether the problem can be solved by stopping it at the source & b) whether one can avoid repeating the problem in the future.

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

I feel badly -- for Maria.

George Bush did not send the Army to Iraq.  The Congress did.  And by 2007, the DEMOCRATS were in control of Congress.

That being said, you are not in Iraq, and I would also venture to guess you are not on the "inside" of the US Government.

Calling a man dumb is not a very nice thing to do.  I am sad for the children, husbands and wives who lost their lives in Iraq.  I have had 3 children go to Middle Eastern wars, thankfully to return alive (2 of them, one is over there now, waiting for the current "president" to decide whether he is going to send troops or let the Marines and Soldiers who are there die because of his inactivity.

You do not know if there were WMD's in Iraq.  How can you possibly know?  The ineffective UN gave Saddam Hussein more than 2 weeks to hide anything they had over in Syria across the border.  Of course no true WMD's were found!  They had all the time in the world to get them somewhere else.

No, I am not dilusional, I'm an alternative.  As the man who wrote the comment about "Devil's Advocate" I am being one.

Unless you were the President of the United States from 2000 to 2008, you have no idea what decisions were made and what info they had.  Why?  Because THAT President decided that protecting our troops was more important than military transparency.  THIS president chooses to malign the last one, point fingers, cry inherited problems... boo hoo! 

Backbones should be required for Presidents.  This president has no backbone.  The puppet masters are running our country into the ground and our troops into death fights.

Stop trying to blame a man who is not in office.  It's not his problem any more.  Pointing a finger does what?  Oh yeah, points 3 back at yourself.

Warmest regards and best intentions,

Kate

Two Wrongs Only Make a Right *In The End*

The Constitution was written so that we don't have to go through both wrongs. Two Rights make a wrong if they aren't made right! War is Wrong. Every Right thing that has a beginning has an end. If it has a beginning and has no end, it is wrong. Bush dooms himself to bad memory. What do You Think? Join Xomba to Tell Us!Get More Traffic to Your Blogs by Telling Tools What You're Already Doing!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

The Devil's Advocate

The movie, The Devil's Advocate, which starred Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves, is an excellent commentary on the legal system in our country today. Al Pacino's diatribe at the end illustrated two things: (1)there are more lawyers per capita in the United States than anywhere else in the world; and, (2)the obfuscation of what pre-1865 was a lay language that any American with some knowledge of history could understand into what is now fraught with more twists, turns, and outright contradictions was a deliberate act to create a special class of citizen to "interpret" the laws for the lay person, which created a buffer between the citizen and his duly-elected representatives in government. The USA Patriot Act, which was ram-rodded through Congress in the aftermath of 9/11, wasn't even read almost all of the Congressmen and women who voted for it. It wasn't until later that anyone bothered to read and see that it gave the president broad, sweeping heretofore unconstitutional powers. (See the website of Downsize DC for more information.)

As is the case with the House of Representatives

Since the term for an incumbent in the House is only two years, if you were to deduct the time spent in recess, in committee, on the campaign trail, and away from their offices, it makes sense that they don't bother to actually read the bills before them because they literally don't have the time. The Founding Fathers never intended for politics to become a career in Washington; career politicians are more likely to become beholden to special interest groups and not their constituency, as has happened. No, they were supposed to fulfill their patriotic duty to pass Constitutional legislation then return home, once they left office, to live under the same laws they set for the rest of us. When you get career politicians, like George H.W. Bush, their offspring don't learn what it is like to live in the real world, so they really don't have anything in common with Joe Sixpack and Sally Soccermom. (It was telling that, during the elder Bush's campaign against Clinton in 1992, Bush couldn't even come close to naming the price of milk and bread that most people were paying. No wonder Clinton won.)

But I Am SupPoseD tO bE ThaT IgNoRanT!

The Framers didn't write all those laws 'just to see if we future-Americans could figure it out the way they did!' Get Traffic to Your Sites by Sending Traffic to the Other Sites You Like!... or ... Join Xomba!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

And That's Not "Yada Yada Yada" as an Individual ...

That's 'Yada Yada Yada' as it was written in the Law of the Land. That's 'Yada Yada Yada' as the blueprint for peace would demand! That's the 'Yada Yada Yada' the American people need to follow! I'm not saying 'JDub' or 'Olbermann' or any particular person should be the next President, but rather that the next President should–if war is deemed necessary–start with an exit-strategy. Maybe we could propose a Constitutional Amendment: "How to Run War" (or something legalese for that). Congress votes to declare it, but repeals the vote if a) President does not propose a realisticly attainable goal or b) stated goal becomes unwanted or -unattainable. Get Traffic to Your Sites by Sending Traffic to the Other Sites You Like!... or ... Join Xomba!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

Is this an attempt to change

Is this an attempt to change the argument from, "The President illegally started a war of aggression," to "It's the fault of the 93rd Congress that the Constitution was subverted and now the President has too much power."? Regarding the Law: Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 states that Congress shall have the power: "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water". the federal government constitutionally only has the power delegated it by We the People, the Congress may not delegate its power to declare war; it absolutely does not have that right. Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." Why can't both of you just admit that you were wrong and recognize the fact that you're fighting the wrong battle. Because there is no "right" battle for me to fight. According to those whom I would serve, I have no power to fight the battle you say is 'right.' The Iraq war is already in it's fifth year and you're arguing about whether or not we should have gone there. We are there. Your argument is over four years too late. Why don't you give us some thoughts about what we can now do to make a respectable exit (if that's what you desire) and find a solution to the problems in the Middle East? That's where I would put the Judiciary Branch ... the war is not legal according to the Supreme Laws, justice is proclaimed by those men; and they do nothing ... why? Get Traffic to Your Sites by Sending Traffic to the Other Sites You Like!... or ... Join Xomba!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member