0
votes

On Columbus Day, Thanksgiving, and Revising History

posted October 14, 2008 - 9:13pm
On Columbus Day, Thanksgiving, and Revising History

Another Columbus Day has come and gone here in the US. Christopher Columbus's arrival in the Caribbean, without a doubt, opened up the indigenous population of North America to untold misery, suffering and death. That, unfortunately, is the legacy of European exploration. We obviously can't change these facts. But should we be celebrating it? That's an important question to ponder.

Thanksgiving will be upon us before we know it. Of course, few us here in America realize that the first official Thanksgiving Proclamation after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock was not about celebrating a bountiful harvest. In 1637, Governor Winthrop of the Massachusetts Bay Colony proclaimed an official day of feasting to give thanks and honor the men of the colony who returned safely after having massacring over 700 Pequot Indian men, woman and children. No, we certainly aren't taught the whole truth in school.

Still, I'm a firm believer in the celebration of Thanksgiving, as long as we don't blind ourselves to the truth of our past. It's still a wonderful occasion to give reverence to all the things we should be thankful for in our lives, regardless of the ugly precept upon which the holiday was founded by our ancestors. We make of the day exactly what we choose to. The Pilgrims certainly didn't invent the concept of setting aside a time to give thanks, anyway. The Native Americans had such customs long before white Europeans landed on their shores, as well cultures all across the globe dating back thousands of years.

If what I've written here seems controversial to you, that's a positive thing. We should continually question our traditions, even if it makes us a little uncomfortable. So many of the historical icons, upon which we place on high pedestals, deserve to be knocked down.

Revising history is a highly volatile subject. Just suggesting that Columbus wasn't such such a nice guy will likely get you shouted down by ultra patriots who might strongly inform you that you can't apply the same standards of conduct and morality of today to past centuries. To some degree, I can understand their argument. However, we do ourselves no favors in honoring figures from our past that do not represent the values of today -- or values we aspire, to anyway. The controversial debates over Columbus Day celebrations will continue to spark outrage and heated demonstrations for many years to come.

I don't expect the holiday to vanish in my lifetime, any more than I expect the racist Andrew Jackson's - responsible for the removal and forced death march of the Cherokee Nation - image to be blotted out from the twenty dollar bill. If I had my way, we'd call all such historical figures out for what they were.


Not a member of Xomba? Join now to comment on this article



Comments

So being a military

So being a military superpower translates to excellence? Maybe to you, not to me. But don't get me wrong I think USA is a great country but that doesn't mean I think everything about it is great. You are a military superpower, you have a huge economy you also have a relatively large degree of individual liberty, I'm not denying these things. But these things doesn't automatically make the country a valid object of worship. You also have a huge national debt, you have high crime rates you have large scale poverty,you have leaders that care more about their own wallets than the economy of the country in addition you have the liberty of having to read the pledge of allegiance out loud every morning in classrooms. "But as far as economics goes - the CIA World Factbook lists the EU's GDP for 2007 at $0.65 trillion more than the US, which made $13.78 trillion. Yet the EU has a population of nearly 500 million, compared to 300 million for the US. That doesn't really sound like a better economy to me" It does to me if you take into account economic growth every year and the young age of this particular economy compared to US economy. A few eastern european countries recently joined the EU as well which would lower the statistics, but eventually lift the economy of those countries. The EU as a whole is growing. "We're not writing on a European website. We're not writing in Norwegian, or French, or German. We're not getting paid by a European company. And we're not discussing the affairs of the EU" what does that have to do with it? I'm not denying these facts. I thank Nick for this website, not the USA as a country and I thank the cold war for pushing for the creation of the internet. I'm not offended by these facts I hope your not offended by facts either. You seem to have a lot of built in pride with regards to US greatness. "Sorry...it's not a competition, but facts are facts. Until the United States is no longer the "lone superpower," I think it's safe to say that we are the standard of excellence. And that's all I have to say about the matter. You can continue to argue about how much better European socialism is, but the facts speak for themselves." That's right, facts are facts,the EU is the largest economy and America is the military superpower I don't deny that but that doesn't mean EU or the US is necessarily that EXCELLENT in every way. I didn't bring up socialism at all! most countries in Europe are not socialist, I'm not socialist and Norway is not socialist. However, Norway is the greatest country on the face of the earth. That's not an economically or politically verifiable fact, that's just my opinion....

Hey, Martin...don't be so

Hey, Martin...don't be so blind. The evidence is right in front of your face. We're not writing on a European website. We're not writing in Norwegian, or French, or German. We're not getting paid by a European company. And we're not discussing the affairs of the EU. But as far as economics goes - the CIA World Factbook lists the EU's GDP for 2007 at $0.65 trillion more than the US, which made $13.78 trillion. Yet the EU has a population of nearly 500 million, compared to 300 million for the US. That doesn't really sound like a better economy to me. Sorry...it's not a competition, but facts are facts. Until the United States is no longer the "lone superpower," I think it's safe to say that we are the standard of excellence. And that's all I have to say about the matter. You can continue to argue about how much better European socialism is, but the facts speak for themselves. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.

Eu economy

"you cannot compare the Union to a country - especially when discussing liberties and military" When it comes to the scale of an economy with a common currency it's comparable. I'm not talking about liberties and military right here I'm simply stating that EU is the largest economy. "I think that in itself shows you how great this country is...you have to combine all of Europe to match our economic output" The EU does not consist of all of europe. It has about 500 million citizens in 27 countries. a population of about 200 million more than USA so of course the EU needs to combine it's economy to surpass the US conomy in terms of GDP. So, I guess the EU is a GREAT union when it comes to economic output? It's certainly greater than the US!

Greatness

It's facts out of context... Again, that's your 3 criteria for greatness. I don't know if it's always all that positive. How many have died in armed conflict serving in your armed forces? what's the illiteracy rate in the USA? You definetely have global impact and you have prosperity as a whole but is that necesarily so great?

No. I'm saying that the

No. I'm saying that the European Union is not a country. Since it is not a country, you cannot compare the Union to a country - especially when discussing liberties and military. Each one of the countries is different in that regard. I'm sure if we ever created the NAU, then that economy would surely surpass the EU. But you're comparing apples and oranges here. You have to redefine the argument in order to compare the EU to the US. I think that in itself shows you how great this country is...you have to combine all of Europe to match our economic output. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.

EU economy

It doesn't matter if EU is not a country. The EU IS a separate economy altogether regardless of wether it's a country or not. Think about the practial implications. If all of Asia had a common currency the economy would be several times larger than USA. Are you saying that wouldn't matter?

Again...my statement still

Again...my statement still stands. All you have done is pointed out that other countries and unions simply do not have the economic prosperity AND the amount of individual liberty AND the military capabilities that the United States has. You cited Norway, China, Russia, and the European Union. Which one of those has all three components I mentioned? Not Norway. Not China. Not Russia. And the European Union is not a country. It was a valiant effort, but the fact remains: All other nations fall short of the global impact and prosperity of the United States. That's not gloating or arrogance...it's just fact. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.

The HDI takes into account

The HDI takes into account economic material aspects as it includes GDP per capita... so according to you total economic output is equivalent to standard of living? In addition having the greatest military force makes you a great nation?? Maybe in your book not mine. But hey, that's YOUR criteria.. I guess it all depends on what criteria you choose to back up the word "Greatest", which could be virtually anything. Russia also has GREAT military force available. I believe several countries has surpassed USA in terms of individual liberty and opportunity. My own country for one. We haven't surpassed your total economic output as that would obviously be impossible considering we're a country of about 5 million people. However GDP doesn't matter much in practical life of the average citizen (and certainly not with regards to standard of living) when you have seemingly bottomless debt and the wealth is not evenly distributed. I'm reminding you that China is the second largest economy so by your standards China is the second GREATEST country in the world? What does that mean? If you had to move from the United States for any reason you would settle in China because it's so GREAT? You are however not the greatest economy in the world in terms of GDP, the EU economy is. (The Eu is not a country by definition but it is a separate economy)

The European Union is not a

The European Union is not a country. It's a union of countries. I'm sure if they created an "Asian Union," it would be larger "in terms of economy and population" too. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.

The European Union is now

The European Union is now larger than the USA in terms of economy and population. I'm sure Columbus would celebrate that! Having a war economy requires wars. In the USA I think you call it foreign policy. Money for your Thoughts - join now OWO-BV

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member