Democracy and the United States (Part Three)
Democracy and the United States (Part Three)
Since we have identified that our federal government is a constitutional republic and that several errors have been made that threaten its continued existence as such, let’s now examine the possible solutions to restore it to its intended form. These solutions will not be easy because of the vast ignorance of the average American citizen. It will take great resolve and sacrifice by a select group of leaders who understand and value the ideas of personal freedom and individual responsibility, along with the notion of limited government.
There are several measures that need to be taken in order to put our country back on the right track. That track is one of a constitutional republic which guarantees individual freedom and liberty to every citizen of the United States. These propositions will not be easy to implement, but they are certainly necessary in order to restore the power to the People and to the States.
One of the first actions needs to be to reform our education system. Our government schools are mostly woefully inept at adequately educating their students. Private school students generally test higher and are more prepared for college and professional careers. Some of the reasons for this may be that private schools are not slowed by government mandated curriculum (such as multiculturalism studies), politically correct methods of dealing with class disruptions, or disputes with government teacher unions.
The Department of Education needs to be either drastically reformed or abolished, but that should not be the extent of improvement. Teacher unions should also be abolished. They should not exist for this very simple reason: They are government employees and therefore work for the tax-paying public. So if they cannot perform up to a respectable standard or if they refuse to work because of wage disputes, they should be fired from their job. It’s time to put the interest of the students (who are the future of this country) ahead of the teachers and their union leaders.
Another possibility would be to implement a voucher system which would allow parents to take the government money that would be used to educate their child in a public school and apply that money to any school of their choice. This would encourage competition between government and private schools alike which would ultimately result in a better overall product for everyone - a superior education. It would put the focus back on the student instead of the government employees. It may even result in higher salaries for teachers. If no feasible solution can be reached, then perhaps the entire system should be privatized. The federal government has demonstrated time and again its vast inability to be efficient and provide a superior product.
Once education improves, other problems will be more easily understood by the public and the ability to fix them will be less problematic.
One simple step that would put this country back on the right track would be the repealing of the 17th Amendment. This would give power back to the States by allowing the representation of their individual constitutions in the federal government. As I stated in part two of this series, the 17th Amendment shifted power away from the States by allowing senators to be elected by the People instead of being appointed by the individual state legislatures. When the States have proper representation in our federal government, it will restore the balance needed between the two Houses of Congress and between the state and federal governments.
The Supremacy Clause in our Constitution affirms that any treaties made with another country become the “supreme Law of the Land”. If only for this reason alone, the individual State constitutions need to be represented by the senators in our Congress. Only the President, with the consent of the Senate, can make treaties with other nations. The Senate votes on treaties because the Senate is supposed to represent the interests of the States and their constitutions, not the constituents of those States. Without the consideration of State laws, undermining state autonomy becomes much easier and can ultimately render their laws irrelevant.
The 17th Amendment ought to be repealed in order to help restore the balance of power. And since one amendment can be easily repealed, why not two?
The 16th Amendment (the implementation of the income tax) should be rescinded as soon as possible. Not only is an income tax a tool of socialism/communism, it is detrimental to our nation’s overall economic development. There is greater than a $500 billion compliance cost every year wasted on our federal tax laws. It pushes many businesses away from our own shores and into the international market in which we compete. An income tax also does not reward hard work or individual economic accomplishments. Additionally, the government’s intrusion into our personal lives, via the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), is a gross infringement of individual freedoms and liberty.
In view of the fact that this law requires mandatory compliance by United States citizens and that many people are exempt from paying taxes or actually receive more money than they pay, it would appear that our tax system violates the simple concept that “all men are created equal.” How can one decide it is constitutional that one citizen is forced - by the threat of imprisonment or severe financial penalties from the federal government - to pay taxes and another citizen is able to benefit from those taxes while being exempt from paying? The fundamental model of our system of taxation is unjust and oppressive and needs to be abolished as quickly as possible.
I understand the government needs revenue to operate, so here is the solution to this problem: the FairTax.
Adopting the FairTax (HR 25, S 1025) would not only abolish the income tax and the IRS, but it would eliminate other taxes as well - such as Social Security and Medicare taxes, corporate income taxes, capital gains taxes, and death taxes - and replaces them with one simple, voluntary, and easy-to-understand sales tax. It also completely lifts any tax burden from the poor. The tax burden for anyone living at or below the poverty level will be nothing (zero, naught, nil, zilch). Nobody – rich or poor – will pay taxes on the basic necessities of life. Furthermore, the FairTax will make the United States the world’s largest tax haven, bringing trillions of American dollars back to our own economy, stimulating economic growth, and strengthening the dollar in the world market.
Oh, and it also takes a vast amount of power away from the demagogues in the federal government and restores it to the People. It nearly eliminates one of the politician’s favorite tactics…class warfare or class envy, and “soaking the rich.”
Another way to help restore our Republic may be to limit the number of Americans that are eligible to vote. There is no guarantee of a right to vote anywhere in our Constitution. We only have laws that prohibit discrimination based on race and gender. Too many citizens go to the polls and vote without an elementary understanding of social, fiscal, or foreign issues, without basic knowledge of the candidates, and some vote while they are currently receiving money from the government for not working. The vote needs to be limited to those citizens that take the time to learn about their country and how it functions, to learn about the candidates and their policies, and they ought to be productive citizens who are not a financial burden to society and consequently will not vote simply for their own economic needs.
The requirements to vote ought to include an age minimum much higher than we currently have. Teenagers should not be voting. The minimum age should be set around twenty-five years old, thus giving citizens enough time to discover and understand their adult interests and attain a higher level of education. Once a person reaches the mandatory age, they should be required to pass a test on American history, government, and politics. This will ensure that they are knowledgeable about our country’s policies and government procedures, and will also show that they actually want to be a part of the process, instead of voting based on family traditions or worthless mass voting campaigns. Having a vote in our elections should be an earned honor or privilege, not a reflexive duty.
Once these main obstacles have been overcome, it will be much easier to fix other problems that plague this nation. When education improves and the States and the People are able to properly utilize their constitutionally protected powers over the federal government, we will be well on our way to restoring the exceptional nature of our Republic. The average United States voter could retain the influence over their elected officials and apply their knowledge and power accordingly in a system that would not be easily manipulated by an uncontrollable Congress. When the People regain their individuality and understand their opportunities and potential in this country, we can then focus our politicians’ attention on other issues – like social programs.
We are currently facing several problems with our welfare-state mentality. Our federal government spends over half of its annual budget on social programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and welfare/unemployment. Despite the fact that several hundred billion dollars are spent on these programs every year by the federal government (and funded by taxpayers), many people feel it is not enough and that the government should, in fact, do more. There is an ever-growing push for socialized medicine and increased spending and coverage for these programs even as Social Security is headed for bankruptcy.
Those are the types of problems that arise from a largely misinformed and improperly educated public who has been conditioned over time to believe that our federal government’s system of collecting and distributing wealth is perfectly acceptable and essential to maintain our way of life. Those are the types of problems that arise when individuality is replaced with collectivism and personal responsibility is replaced with endless litigation. Those are the types of problems that arise from democracy, when the will of the majority supersedes the freedoms and liberties of the individual.
The reality of the situation is this: Democracy is what is causing the domestic problems we face today. It is no longer accepted by our congressmen that they are there to abide by constitutional law. They now act according to the demands of the people even when the constitution explicitly forbids a certain action. Law is rewritten and the language is obscured. If they were to treat this government like that of a constitutional republic, many of the problems we face today would have been avoided.
It’s time for the citizens of the United States to stop flirting with disaster and start acting responsibly to restore the promises of greatness and opportunity.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” – Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1776
Related Articles
- Login or register to post comments |
- 37 reads |
- Email this page |
- Printer-friendly version |
- Publius's Xombytes |
Submitted by 
Democracy
I agree with you that the Public Education system needs some reform, but I think your view that Teachers shouldn't be allowed to form a Union like any other Union is really anti-American. The right to form a Union is important to counterbalance against institutions. Workers rights are essential to maintain a fair wage and working conditions for those who invest their life into that field, practice, or career. The Federal Government needs to better fund the States, so that the States may better fund the schools and pay the teachers a decent salary. The quality of teachers is important. If you don't pay them well enough, the performance goes down and you have less people wanting to become teachers. Private schools already compete with the public school system, and continue to produce scholars and intellectuals, doctors, scientists, and so on. It's only problematic because it promotes an elitist attitude. The idea that because you pay thousands more dollars, that you have a better education.
I partly agree with you about the Income Tax. Not only is it illegal and should never have been instated, but it is too complicated and filled with loop holes- which results in a terrible bureaucracy. However, the way our society is structured and run- is primarily on a fiscal budget- which can't function by simply replacing our current tax system with a new sales tax. It's borderline elitist, which imposes a flat tax on everyone at the expense of those who are low income. Do you know how high you'll have to raise the sales taxes in order to compensate for what would've been income taxes collected? What sales taxes would you increase? Would you tax food? It's not a good system for a budget. The Government needs to know how much money to count on for the next fiscal year. Knowing that certain people owe certain taxes every year makes for easier budgets- where as sales taxes are dependent upon whether or not people are buying or purchasing products, and at what volume. This could work to replace the tax system, but I think the first step would be to reform the income tax to be more proportional- instead of just getting rid of it entirely. We need to transition into getting rid of it.
As far as "limiting who can vote"- I've struggled with this issue for a while, and finally concluded that it would be wrong to restrict voting, and only leave politics to those who are elite. You seem to embrace Plato's philosophy on governance- which is the idea of "Philosopher Kings"- those who are elite intellectually, and therefore know what is best for the people. There is good logic for this reasoning, but it is also problematic. Realize that the "Philosopher King" idea isn't anything new- and it's happening today. This is what the delegate system in the United States is. Where certain people, mostly the elite, have a vote that is more valuable than the average citizen. Although, a proportion of these votes are tied to or allocated based on the popular vote- it isn't a true democracy. To suggest that we should limit people's votes even more so, is not an American value. As a scholar, you may view yourself and your experiences as worthy of a vote, yet in comparison to 10 working class people with a high school education, in a democracy, you're interests are outnumbered. What YOU think is best for the country, might not be. For example: Slavery. By women and blacks gaining the right to vote- the political landscape changed. Politics became open grounds for minorities who otherwise, never had a say. It was no longer about the agenda of old white men.
It's important for us to understand and recognize the resilience of human intelligence. I have faith in our ability to educate ourselves if we are all given the chance. The reason you fear the populist vote, is because it's in the best interest of the population- of which you are uncertain of the change that may come about if they are truly represented.
Jarrod A. McQueen
Drive_The_Nation
I appreciate the comments, but I wholeheartedly disagree.
I'll just touch on a few things here.
"...I think your view that Teachers shouldn't be allowed to form a Union like any other Union is really anti-American."
No, it really isn't anti-American. If you consider the whole of the argument, we shouldn't have a government education system in the first place. It is not an institution consistent with our constitutional republic. Since teachers are paid with money taken from the citizens whose children are being taught (and even those without children), they ought not be able to form unions that make it harder to fire bad teachers or go on strike for pay raises without the consent of the taxpayers who pay their salaries. They serve the public interests (the taxpaying citizens) and those services should never cease as long as their money is confiscated by force.
"The Federal Government needs to better fund the States, so that the States may better fund the schools and pay the teachers a decent salary."
More money will not fix the system which is already poor by world standards. We constantly increase funding for our government schools, but the added money produces no results. Besides, it was never supposed to be the responsibility of the federal government to take money from all of the citizens of the individual states and redistribute it for purposes of an individual's education.
"Private schools already compete with the public school system, and continue to produce scholars and intellectuals, doctors, scientists, and so on. It's only problematic because it promotes an elitist attitude. The idea that because you pay thousands more dollars, that you have a better education."
An elitist attitude? Being properly educated is not elitist. And with that logic, are you saying that the purpose of government education is to promote a common mediocrity? Also, if I pay thousands more for my education, I would expect to have a better education. Otherwise, why am I paying thousands of dollars?
"However, the way our society is structured and run- is primarily on a fiscal budget- which can't function by simply replacing our current tax system with a new sales tax. It's borderline elitist, which imposes a flat tax on everyone at the expense of those who are low income."
Have you read the FairTax bill or visited their website? They address these issues and the questions you asked in-depth at FairTax.org. It is not "elitist" and the poor would pay no taxes. Please go read that website.
"You seem to embrace Plato's philosophy on governance- which is the idea of "Philosopher Kings"- those who are elite intellectually, and therefore know what is best for the people."
I don't quite embrace the notion that philosophers ought to be ruling nations, but there is some merit to his arguments in that intellectuals, or the educated class should have more sway in our nation's politics. And what is with your continual references to the "elite"?
"This is what the delegate system in the United States is...it isn't a true democracy."
Your understanding of the delegate system is a little errant, but the glaring mistake is your apparent belief that this system is supposed to be a true democracy. This entire series was written to explain why we are not and should not be a democracy.
"As a scholar, you may view yourself and your experiences as worthy of a vote, yet in comparison to 10 working class people with a high school education, in a democracy, you're interests are outnumbered."
And this is exactly why we are a constitutional republic. Our constitution protects the rights of the individual from the mob. Democracy is a mob. Democracy is what our Founding Fathers wanted to prevent. Go back and read the first part of this series.
"The reason you fear the populist vote, is because it's in the best interest of the population- of which you are uncertain of the change that may come about if they are truly represented."
You're exactly right. The populist vote is not in the best interest of our republic. The populist voters use the power of voting to redistribute wealth according to their needs. I don't want these people to be truly represented. The change they bring to our government is that of socialist and communist tendencies. Which is the entire reason I wrote this series...to show why and how our constitutional republic is falling into the hands of leftists.
This is not about elitism. It is about protecting basic individual rights that are supposed to be guaranteed by our constitutional laws. We are a capitalist nation and we are a constitutional republic. That is what has made this country great and that is what will ensure our greatness continues.
*If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.
You need to read the article
You need to read the article again and figure out what the balance of power is -nation.
Your arrogance is appalling and your lack of knowledge of how our Government works is non existent. People like you wouldn't vote until you understood what is un American and what isn't. Our founding fathers made sure of that, or so they thought. This is the clearest explanation I have ever read of how our Government works. Thanks Publius. WOW our Founding Fathers were smart. I would say read the article over again there --nation.
Definition of democracy for ya nation
PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE CHIEF STAFF
CITIZIENSHIP Democracy:
A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of DIRECT expression. Results in Mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic--negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Written in 1928 well before you or I were walking this earth. We were a Republic than and now. We should ask our Representatives we elected to remind us of that.
==Nation, Go read the article again
I am glad that you would be first in line to take the test of how our Republic works right nation?