Does God Want you to be Rich? (Part 3 of 4)


Does God Want you to be Rich? (Part 3 of 4)

0
points

This may seem esoteric (or just plain boring) to a lot of you, but it’s important for me to externalize -- because I see so many Christians struggling with confusion between what they have been “guilt-tripped” into believing and what their hearts yearn to believe. Christianity has a problem. How can it hold the interest of a society that sees itself as increasingly enlightened, empowered and wanting more out of life, without backtracking on ideas it has long sought to ingrain in the Christian conscience? Needing to ask whether God wants us to be rich, happy, healthy or successful reveals just the outward tip of this dissonance.

Can you say "Repressed?"

Who knows -- the theology of denial and sacrifice, or delayed gratification, or "pie in the sky," might turn out to be the ultimate path to enlightenment. But what can you say about a religion that has tried to force this theology on modern man -- by shaming his desires, ridiculing his dreams, destroying his science and suppressing his imagination? I would say it must be at a crossroads.

Since the beginnings of industrialization, when survival began to get easier, the child in us has been crying out to our mother, the church -- not begging for a new father, but only for a new set of crayons, so we can draw his picture the way we want to see him, colorful and smiling.

We could not go on much longer believing there can be no glory in this life, when pleasure seems so close at hand. This is not to say that the pursuit of pleasure is wise, only that at some point, it demands to be explained. It would be of great service to us if the church could protect us from our destructive, selfish pursuits -- but only in a way that makes sense to an intelligent mind. Not by painting a picture of God with his finger pointed, saying, "Shame!"

What took you so long?

And so, there arose in Europe and America in the 1800s, societies of people who were not going to be held back or pushed around by religion any longer. Some were atheists, and came to be known as Freethinkers. Others, like Ralph Waldo Emerson, retained their fervent faith in God, only to paint him with a new set of colors.

Apparently, Emerson saw that there could be glory in this life even while we looked forward to the next. He asserted his right to pursue happiness, and understood God was not opposed to it. He believed in the power of the human mind to unchain this glory, and he asserted his right to use it. "There is no thought in any mind, but it quickly tends to convert itself into a power," he said, and "once you make a decision, the universe conspires to make it happen."

You Go Girl

As people began to recognize the power of “positive thinking” to bring about change, they sought a supernatural explanation for this power. This was the birth of the “New Thought” movement -- mental discipline combined with an extreme makeover of God’s image.

Many of the pioneers were women. Mary Baker Eddy founded "The Church of Christ, Scientist" (Christian Science) in 1879 after miraculously "overcoming the challenges of poor health and financial and emotional hardship" by discovering her "relationship to a loving God" (paraphrased from their website). Not many years later, the amazing Harriet Emily Cady had a similar "overcoming" experience, and went on to write "Lessons in Truth," which remains the standard teaching text of Unity Church.

These women were in no way fixated on money (they had better things to work on) but they did see God as an always-benevolent life-force that will bring about all things for our good. Instant results they did not promise, but a nearly-instant peace from knowing that good things were on their way. This peace, in itself, can quickly heal and empower.

Who's your Daddy?

In order to fully accept and benefit from this peace, we must learn to see God differently. No longer does he intentionally withhold earthly blessings or count suffering as good for the soul. We need only recognize, trust and open our hearts to receive everything from him.

An affluent society cannot help but see God as more loving than our peasant ancestors saw him. Life has gotten easier! Then it logically follows that he is more loving and accepting of everybody, even those who don't wear the cross. Indeed, “he” has no use for opinions or damning distinctions, for God is not even a “he.” God is the very force of love, the one source of all goodness. To the religious right, this is "relativism," and they rail against it as the biggest threat to “truth” and Christianity. To some of us, it is simply painting God and Jesus with a broader brush than before.

Positive thinking has paved the way for some evangelicals to declare, “God wants you to be rich.” I see this as a shallow attempt to reap the benefits of mental discipline without surrendering a controlling, “jealous” and vindictive imagery of God. Yes, we might improve our finances with a focused effort of the mind (yawn). The world might gain a few Christian millionaires out of this -- just what we all need -- but I don’t think there will be a lasting benefit to the church or society at large, for it misses the whole point of New Thought.

If there is one thing we want more than wealth and an easy life, it is to believe in a God who loves us. We cannot believe this with the right side of our brain while the left side continues to damn our brothers and sisters to hell.

Thanks for your patience, and to Xomba for the bandwidth. I promise to wrap this up in one more boring and repetitive installment.





Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Publius's picture

What are you implying here?

What are you implying here? Do you believe people who are devout Catholics are not as smart as the "freethinkers" in society? Do you believe that their God and His teachings have to be molded to "fit in" with modern culture? The main aspect of most religions in the world is the teaching of consistent moral behavior and values. They have a strong faith in their religion because they really do believe in the principles of that morality. Wealth, technology, science, or medicine does not compare to the spiritual connection felt in one's religion. The people who hold these beliefs dearly are not foolish or ignorant. They do believe that God loves them and they do believe that He wants them to live a happy and prosperous life. I don't think Christians beat themselves up for being successful. I think you may be missing the point of what religion offers to its faithful.

Joe Snare's picture

Very glad you asked

I think I’ve put all my cards on the table without implying any insults. This essay is about the relationship between religion and psychology. I hypothesize that man can not look at the universe in the same way he did 300 years ago, including how he conceives of God. In case I need a disclaimer, I admit that I could be wrong. I observe that many, many people I know, of all ages, are not getting the comfort they need from the “old” theology. You ask whether I believe the church has to mold itself to the culture. I say no, the church doesn’t have to do anything. The church can do what it wants. It just won’t be helping all of the people I know who are disillusioned. They will have to find their answers somewhere else. If this is the result the church is looking for, they should not change a thing. I’m sincerely happy for you if your faith gives you peace. I consider myself a participant in Christianity and that’s why I am a tough critic of it.

Lastly, you mentioned moral behavior and values. I’ve always felt these would be a natural result of people being at peace with themselves and the creator. Anyway, I did not go there in this essay, so I wonder why you bring it up? Are you saying that people who have given up perceiving God as a domineering patriarch don’t have moral values? Again, you can see “him” in whatever way brings peace to your heart. I would like to see God defined or presented in a way that will not make so many people neurotic. If it can, perhaps morality will live to see a better day. Not to mention world peace.

AnthonyB's picture

" New Thought " is an old cop out.!!!!

You base and measure Gods love for us to the material things we now posess as compared to our ancestors who were serfs and poor farmers etc. So God loves you more now because you can sit with your laptop and spew whatever as compared to when your great great grandfather had to use a quill pen ? And because he loves you more, you can sort of relate to him a little easier than grandad. He's alot nicer, more acceptable and accesable. In fact, it makes you feel like you can even hangout with this God. He is just one of the boys. You are even more equal to him as well. No need to bow down and fear anymore, right ? Tell that to the victims of the tsnuamis and the displaced hurricane victims. The children who see war. The old and frail, the diseased. The guy who sits in a wheel chair or the blind.

No my friend, your ancestors never qualified Gods love on their comforts nor should you. And let me nip it in the bud before I'm accused of saying God punished the people of the tsunami's or New Orleans or 9 / 11. I'm no right wing evangelist yet who are we to say anyway. My God, destroyed this earth once already by flood when he had lost patience with the acceptance of evil by human beings. He also destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gommmorah among many interventions including wars. What mans belief in God has always been based is not material things and comforts but the human condition in itself.

We are the only species who know we are going to die. We are the only ones that ponder where we came from and where we are going. We have concience and the ability to measure right and wrong and we have the ability to know that there is at least the possibility of a higher power and that alone even on the unreligious determine our good behavior so as to please him and yeah, to not piss him off. My God is a loving God who has also given us free will. He gives every chance to do the right thing. We are not animals, he made us " beings " in his image !

The time to " hang " with him will be there for all who worship him and live justly in the face of this evil earth. With all it's porn and greed, and abortion and war and self gratification through wealth and sex and drug use etc. My God is someone to fear and worship and love all at the same time. His promise after sending his only son to be sacrificed so as to cleanse this earth is nothing short of eternal salvation and everlasting life. Now, the people you know who are dissappointed and this "New Thought" is really only people who feel God like themselves and got a little taste of power and now feel hurt that they can't have it all. So they get pissed off at God because they can't live forever on this great planet with all it's pleasures. So surely we need to re - think this whole God thing, hence then comes this New Thought which comes with every generation that improves the quality of life over that of their fathers. Give em a little and they want more.

You say you live a somewhat Christian life and this is why you are tough on it, questioning it. Hopfully I helped you in your uneasyness with your faith though that was not my intention. I'm only saying the church and it's leaders, the Pope in my case stand firm and will bend but never break for modern society and it's advances. If you can't cut it then thats to bad. It's not easy being Catholic or even Christian today but we have an attitude that says, if you can't stand the heat, you should get used to it because it's a lot hotter in hell.

Antonia Dwells's picture

Your god sounds like a bitch.

"My God is someone to fear and worship and love all at the same time."

"...if you can't stand the heat, you should get used to it because it's a lot hotter in hell."

AnthonyB's picture

it takes one to know one

is'nt that what they say ?

Antonia Dwells's picture

That is what they say.

But I don't know your god,
so the saying doesn't really apply here.

AnthonyB's picture

thats ok, he knows you. My God IS also your God

There is only one God Antonia, just different views and interpretations of him.

Joe Snare's picture

I'm Okey Dokey You're Okey Dokey

AnthonyB, I appreciate your comments and I have nothing bad to say about anyone's personal faith, other than to say that it might not be right for me. But I feel I should respond to a couple of assumptions or generalizations you made...

First, I am not uneasy in my faith, I don't know what led you to think so. Secondly, I didn't say I lead a somewhat Christian life. How a person "leads their life" is a behavioral question. I never said I'm well-behaved, although darn it I usually am, but just 'cuz I don't get out enough. I don't define faith this way. Third, the books I've read on New Thought -- it makes me cringe to give a name to this thing -- have nothing to do with power, self-gratification or being pissed off. But again, I appreciate the dialogue and yer OK by me.

AnthonyB's picture

yer OK by me as well Joe

Look, we all question our faith and purpose in life and of course our institutions. That is the human condition. When you said you were a " participant " and thus a critic, I may have misread that to mean you were merely going along and misinterpreted that to be that you were probably uneasy in your faith. We all go through this but I apologize for reading between the lines and assuming. Usualy people will say " I am a Christian " or " I am Catholic ". I don't say i'm participating in the Catholic faith. That along with your other posts have shown me a young man who seems confused and even angry with religion in general. This is not a critisism but an observation which I see all to regularly in life. Again, your cool , I'm cool, I hope you find answers and I apologize for the fact I tend to get a little overheated but i've been bombarded in recent years and i'm like that movie," I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore " lol, good luck.

Publius's picture

Joe, I think you took my

Joe, I think you took my comment the wrong way. I am not insulted by what you said, and I don't think anything you said was insulting. I'm just not sure where you're going with all of this. If people feel their religion is not providing them with the comfort they desire, why do they continue to practice it? They shouldn't change the teachings of their faith, they should probably seek another faith altogether. Religions have morals and symbolic stories established within their faith. It is a "take it or leave it" approach that most of them preach. If you're going to be a part of that community, be a part of it and follow its teachings. If you can't comply because of certain social conditions or if you're not comfortable with the answers it provides for you, then don't be a member of that religious community.

People get caught up with believing they need to be part of something, then when they can't follow certain beliefs they get frustrated and want to change them instead of simply leaving. If that's the psychological aspect you were referring to, then we can agree. I don't think any individual should try to change the belief structure of their religion for the sole purpose of a particular disagreement. If your religion is not compatible with the lifestyle that makes you happy, then find a new religion.

Joe Snare's picture

Movement or fad?

Very well said -- but how many people are uncomfortable? If it reaches critical mass, the institution will adapt to what people's hearts/minds/gut feelings are telling them, instead of the other way around. When it looks like times are changing, you can't tell if you're in the middle of a fad, or the beginning of a movement. (Sort of like when rock 'n' roll started, people dismissed it, and now the London Symphony Orchestra has their own rock guitarist.) I suspect that is what is going on here and why you've got all this "feel good" stuff coming from Evangelicals, but it's new wine in old wineskins for them. My perspective is having been Catholic, Protestant, Unity, and hung out with some Charismatics, Evangelicals, whatever. As a generalization, the only ones who don't seem to have a lot of angst about their faith are the ones who have freed themselves from traditional religion, but they ain't giving up on Jesus. I think these old religions are pregnant with people wanting to split, they just haven't figured out where to go yet, and they can't put their finger on why they feel so conflicted.

AnthonyB's picture

Religion is not a feel good festival

As a Catholic, my view of this started with Martin Luther. It has always been difficult to be Catholic. No pain no gain lol. To be serious, Luther found he could make changes to suit his view yet he could not completly rid his old foundation to start his new religion. In fact, compared to the many splinter groups from his original Protestantism, his split from Catholocism was mild. Still, however, a split. Hard line Catholics and I don't totaly disagree may say Luther could not cut it as a Catholic, so he made his own religion with it's own doctrine. Then hard line Lutherans would say Calvin could not cut it as a Lutheren etc. You have the Methodists, Presbeteryians, Adventists etc. I personaly know many who have returned to the Catholic faith but I don't disagree with your statement that many churches are bulging with dis - satisfied people. The problem lies with the feel good instant gratification and justify my lifestyle crowd. Boy that was a mouthful. Religion and faith will make you feel good and have peace within but it should never be mistaken for feel good only festival. There is worship, reflection, abstinance for many things, pennance and repenting as in my faith. These things are far from easy and not often instant feel good. If people want that they should join a health spa or a club where they can tan and whirlpool themselves and have martini's afterward with a nice lunch. That is instant feel good and yes, even justify my hard working and lets party life style.

Antonia Dwells's picture

Naw, now, get real. You needn't call me God Antonia.

"There is only one God Antonia, just different views and interpretations of him."

Now, really.

Antonia Dwells's picture

Religion: not a feel-good festival.

That's why religion sucks.

AnthonyB's picture

On the contrary, Antonia

Religion does not suck. There is something beautiful and powerful in the fellowship of a group who feel and worship the same way. And take comfort in their traditions. If your alone it's easier to make qualifications and justifications for your every move. I'm not saying you need religion to worship but please don't say religion sucks. I don't say a lone worshiper sucks. Or even an agnostic or atheist. They don't suck. We are all children of God. Now of course I don't want to say it's my way or the highway as a Catholic. But my faith is descended from the very followers of Jesus Christ, the apostles. My church and our original traditions were made by them as they thought would please Christ. Some things such as communion was an actual directive of Jesus. " Do this to remember me " he said. Did they get it all right. No, they are just men. Still their traditions and what we Catholics call the Apostolic line that has overseen the church to this day try very hard to stay true to what we feel Christ would want while still bending to conform to modern society, Bending , never breaking ! Other faiths and their beliefs I'm sure feel just as passionate about their form of worship. In the end Antonia, it's all good.

Antonia Dwells's picture

Oh, that's right. Religion doesn't suck.

Religion blows.

People suck.

AnthonyB's picture

Antonia, Antonia, your terrible

just terrible lol

Antonia Dwells's picture

This I Am

Antonia Dwells