Gays: The New Blacks
posted May 29, 2008 - 4:40pmLast week gay marriage was legalized in California. Today New York's Governor has given the okay for gay marriages from other states and countries to be recognized in New York state.
Now the conservative nutcases are out in full force to deny this very important equal right to gays and lesbians in our country. The Human Rights Campaign is reporting that the right-wing lawmakers have gathered a petition of one million signatures to put a gay marriage ban on the ballot in California in November.
Isn't this the same discrimination that reminds one of the former law where a black person could not marry a white person?
If the majority of white people wanted to keep that ban would that be "right"? When will our government just say "This is it! Gays should have the right to marry like any other person and it doesn't matter what the majority says."? If the majority says it's okay to kill someone, does that make it right?
This issue is just crazy. Equal rights for everyone. That's what this country should stand for. It's time for some strong individuals to say just that. Let's not let gays be the new blacks.


Comments
@Bbi-ade-MBc You Tie Yourself to Sin
In Left Behind 2: Tribulation Force, Kirk Cameron's character caught a man storming out of church. The man said something like 'I'm a good man; I don't need Jesus." To which Kirk replied, "Well, have you ever looked at a woman not your wife with lust after her body?"
"Well, yeah."
"Then you're an adulterer, not 'a good man'; have you ever stolen anything?"
"No."
"Not even a little thing?"
"Well, yeah of course."
"Then you're an adulterous robber! You're probably a liar as well! That's why you need Jesus!"
Such pagan reasoning (that 'Jesus Christ burned to offer a sweet fragrance to the Lord' or something) makes me sick, but there is a point; cause/effect-tendencies are sinful things, and habitual sins are the result of choices made over-and-over until they start to seem automatic. That's what Jesus Christ meant when He said 'all will become as children': we humans don't act according to the way we acted in the past, but rather the way that leads to all life.
---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!
Two & Two Have a Right to Equal Five, but Not on Our Books
Homosexual Marriage-Declaration: Why should we get behind that kind of a goal? First--let's ask ourselves--what purposes does marriage serve?
I think of two: 'ego-security' (i.e. that your social standing doesn't depend on "how comfortable people are around you," which somehow makes people comfortable around you) and 'well-set future' (i.e. that the your offspring have a steady pattern at their foundation).
The first purpose--as many heterosexual marriages have shown through divorce--isn't secured through official channels. And the second purpose isn't secured through official channels either.
The only thing marriage does for the government is increase the chances of obediant population---for which the government then rewards the parents by lightening the load. Does homosexual marriage increase the chance that the couple will find a volunteer of the opposite sex to conceive a child?
I'm thinking, no. I imagine that 'childlessness' is one of the perks of homosexual partnership.
---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!
That's Cool
mrbronco... I understand why
Who is Publius?
What is Rational Liberty?
How do I join Xomba and get PAID to write?
Sorry:(
Visit my homepage here
Follow me on Twitter here
That's Where You're Wrong
God and...
The Truth Often Has That Effect
FreeCracker4Jack Join the ranks of starving amateur writers competing for your attention and praises! SIGN UP HERE
drop the e please
http://www.xomba.com/referral/7778de9b
http://www.xomba.com/user/adrienne
It's Bobbi, not Bobbie