0
votes

GWB Administration still trying to gut the speech and free speech issues

posted February 8, 2007 - 4:19pm
GWB Administration still trying to gut the speech and free speech issues

Move On, the grass roots organization sent information which should be of interest to all writers, even if they just post under the TOS for adsense and Google at www.xomba.com

REAL!-dedicated-WRITERS don't have time to watch PBS or listen to NPR . . .Do they?< p>

Perhaps your kids watch PBS, have seen the programs below. Maybe you listen to that bleeding heart liberal NPR. (I Do.) Well, Mr. GWB is at it again. The Constitution is being stripped and turned into . . . uh . . . bathroom sheet tissues, by what is left of this Administration's term. Most people think the document (Constitution) and what it stands for is important. GWB flaunts it at every opportunity. (Read the Constitution, but especially see Article V, and visit www.article5.org. to learn about your government. Scary stuff.)
====================================
www.MoveOn.org sent this to me:
====================================
"George W. Bush is trying—yet again—to slash funding for NPR and PBS. This week, Bush proposed a new budget with devastating cuts to public broadcasting.1 "Sesame Street" and other ad-free kids' shows are under the knife. So is the independent journalism our country needs.
"Enough is enough. We've fought this fight before and won—but we can't afford the risk anymore. With the new Congress, we can make sure this never happens again. We need Congress to insulate NPR and PBS from the political winds.
"Congress must save NPR and PBS once and for all. Congress should guarantee permanent funding and independence from partisan meddling."
==================================

"Congress can protect NPR and PBS from future cuts. The long-term solution to save public radio and TV is to:

* fully restore this year's funding

* guarantee a permanent funding stream free from POLITICAL
pressure

* reform how the money is spent and keep partisan APPOINTEES from pushing a POLITICAL bias

"Bush's budget would cut federal funds for public broadcasting by nearly 25%. According to PBS, the cuts "could mean the end of our ability to support some of the most treasured educational children's series" like "Sesame Street," "Reading Rainbow," and "Arthur."

As telecommunications chair Rep. Ed Markey said, "In a 24-7 television world with content often inappropriate for young children, the public broadcasting system represents an oasis of quality, child-oriented educational programming. We owe America's children and their parents this free, over-the-air resource."

The cuts could also decimate one of the last remaining sources of watchdog reporting on TV—continuing the partisan war on journalism led by the ex-chair of public broadcasting, Ken Tomlinson More people trust public broadcasting than any corporate news media. President Bush would rather undermine our free press than face reporters who are asking tough questions.

===========================
http://www.freepress.net/publicbroadcasting/=policy

Sources:
1. "Bush Proposes Steep Cut to PBS Funding," TV Week, February 5, 2007
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=11508

2. PBS' Ready to Learn program (funds "Sesame Street" and other children's shows)
http://www.pbs.org/readytolearn/

3. "Tomlinson Slinks Away," MediaCitizen, November 3, 2005
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=2347&id=9851-7549903-TwTRmV4SbAa0Q_NcjuIf7w&t=4

4. "2005 'Open to the Public' Objectivity and Balance Report," Corporation for Public Broadcasting, January 31, 2006
http://www.cpb.org/aboutcpb/goals/objectivity/



Comments

Nowhere near the recomposition intended, but here it is.

I am composing this off of xomba, so I should not lose it! A) Why should the government be supporting any communication outlets, Les, regardless of their merits? B) How is government support of these failing entities consistent with our constitutional right to free speech? X. Normally I would have wondered too, wondering why vote for the support any funding for a system of public information. Then I realized, these were about the most intelligent communications I was listening to, and there really was no "left" bleeding heart liberal bias. That line was from the fox-brain thieves and skimmers of the system attempting to put more advertising on the air, or more "why are we funding a 'public' frequency or outlet?," pretending to be libertarian in their words. Okay. You (me) and they use the 'public' roads and the skimmers are trying to sell them out from under you. (indiana tollway?, or is that some public road in ohio?) You own the airwaves that a cellphone company says they bought from the government and such and such bandwidth the FCC auctioned off to them, and we do not mind selling off parts of these technologically accessible frequencies of communication. But I do object that the truth is not told on them. I object that the users slant and taint and lie through their use of the public airwaves. MY PRODUCT is SUPERIOR to YOUR PRODUCT ACCORDING to THESE TESTIMONIALS. Pepsi is better than Coke. We know that is BS. However, PBS and NPR are not Propaganda outlets, or perhaps they are if they promote "truth and knowledge" about what the rest of the media ignores because of vested investments. Like FOX, who should be banned as failing to meet it's public service agreements to use the airwaves in a balanced and impartial manner. -- (Yeah, if I were dictator, I would simply shut them off, and I would jail those who want the smut of lies and murdoch even posted, the continued misuse and abuse of the 'public' trust. Yeah. As a dictator, I would not have a bit of use for these malefactions, Not! in my society! I want the TRUTH dirty and as offensive as it might be, and verifiably as close to it as a scientific approach can come. Questions like the number of christians or atheists or muslims ghosts that can dance on pinheads or rise up in the second coming just aren't going to be part of the public broadcasting use of the public airwaves unless they are balanced second by second with open truthful information about the world, the universe or some non-commercialized investigstive report into what actually happened to the bodies of the people on flight 93. what local jurisdiction had the responsibility? A real report with the fingerprints, and the DNA used, and tewstimony from those Families who survived and what they have done with the money they recieved from us for the "death"caused by the 9-11-01 'terrorist' attack. ("loose change", see the video) and the sworn and filmed efforts of the investigators doing the actual and documentary work, so you see the bodies of loved ones like the skeletal remains of those at Auschwitz, and the detailed honest accounts of the nazi's in their records of jewish persecution and inhuman inhumanity. (My father was with Patton and detailed to the recovery of some of the concentration death camps records; he never doubted what America was about during those times in Europe before the end of WW II.) My reason for wanting my tax money spent on truth and good reporting is that there is damned little of it reported on the local or national news that is not propaganda or advertising telling me coke is better than pepsi (which is true.) The war in Iraq was NEVER about 911. Never about Saddam's WMD, Biological, Chemical or whatever, and never realy about Oil, though there is an awful lot of oil money coming from there. The war in Iraq is the neocon BS with the Multinationasl military industrial complex IKE warned about coming with bid-free blessing of Chaney's Halliburton to feed at the us TREASURY. The war is a way to milk the american people for the wealth of a few, and the president and vice president and billionaires club and all the presidents men and alberto and condi and on and on are in on it. Powell is the only one who had a spine, and he has always known the truth. The war is just about transferring money from our treasury to a bunch of mutinationals to get rid of any supposed surplus that might let Americans smarten and educate their young in the future, or fix their infra structure. . .. This is not what I wrote the first time. see www.foavc.org, and www.cc2.org, and www.article5.org What has this got to do about the Constitution? and free speech, which are illusions now? Well look at and learn about Article V. It is the last bloodless way to recover America from the new multinationals heading us into the North American Union, abandoning the US like traitors (and your Congressmen and Senators are a part of this business team) to create the wealthiest economic chip in the world game. That depends only to a small degree on the amount of money being bled from us on Iraq. But more upon the continued deceit of American "leadership" betraying the public trust and not being hung as traitors. SO when I see what this Admin is funding to steal from us, I say give NPR and PBS the funds sent to Iraq for a month and they would be funded 'til the end of the 21st century. And we might get a better idea of the truth, if they are the reporters. Lame as it is it is a hint of what is really going on and how the dumbing down has been a successful ploy by scum we have allowed to steal our leadership. I think the worm will turn, and soon.

Look. You are right and I am wrong. I will re-compose

A sensible reply that might even be persuasive, but I am doing some science now and flitting around. Actually, I only want to broaden peoples perspective, and we agree on six jillion other things, hang-in there too. les

Sorry the review got lost,

Sorry the preview got lost, Les. I always like to see what you're thinking, whether we agree or not. On the PBS/NPR funding issue, I guess we agree to disagree. I can assure you though, I wouldn't want to see that funding go to Iraq. http://www.xomba.com/user/thewonderer

thanks for the comment

I spent over an hour. I had a nice response. about 1000 words. I went to preview it, got interuppted by an IM someone sent me and the preview was lost. As they say, screw it. From the philosophical position you outline in a few words the debate or engagement with you is pointless. give the money away in iraq. nick needs to have pg fix it so the preview has temporary substance. I do not think the memory requirement is that high. but YOU know that has been a problem, too. my long reply would not have likely gotten through your armor, espoused in a few words on NPR and PBS. Fund the democracy-in-iraq-farce, not free speech. thanks for your comment. I'm just ticked at the system xomba is using and hope there is a down the road to improve it. I know you do too. visit www.foavc.org study also www.article5.org nothing personal, we just do not agree on what the US is, and I believe it is pointless to debate entrenched assumptions.

Why should the government be

Why should the government be supporting any communication outlets, Les, regardless of their merits? I consider myself somewhat libertarian and at this stage, I want the government to do better at meeting its constitutional obligations and leave the rest alone. I'm more concerned about proposals to regulate the internet (which may be valid in some cases) than those to defund public broadcasting. The growth of the internet and cable broadcasting has given access to viewpoints of every possible description. Public support of PBS and NPR is just another way for government to take money I might want to use to support my kids, and instead support programming that can't otherwise compete in a free market. How is government support of these failing entities consistent with our constitutional right to free speech? http://www.xomba.com/user/thewonderer

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member