0
votes

Has PETA's Welfarist Approach to Factory Farming Abuses Helped Animals?

posted November 26, 2007 - 11:58pm
Has PETA's Welfarist Approach to Factory Farming Abuses Helped Animals?

PETA has almost singlehandedly put animal rights on the map. It's an in-your-face organization with very thick skin that never gives up on changing public attitudes about animals and how we should treat them. Nevertheless, there is one thing about PETA that I can't accept: its increasingly welfarist stand on issues like the treatment of animals killed for the fast food industry.

KFC is a case in point. After achieving some success with getting Wendy's, Burger King and McDonald's to adopt animal welfare standards, PETA in 2001 presented KFC with a list of five requests: 1) adopt an "Animal Care Standards" program that would improve the living conditions in chicken sheds, 2) use controlled-atmosphere killing (CAK) so that the birds would be dead before their throats were slit or their bodies were scalded for defeathering, 3) use mechanized chicken gathering instead of employing factory-farm workers to roughly throw them into transport crates, 4) no more breeding for rapid growth and force-feeding drugs, 5) make welfare standards transparent and verifiable.

As of this date, KFC has refused to comply with any of the above items despite an aggressive PETA Kentucky Fried Cruelty campaign that continues to this day. PETA has enlisted distinguished celebrities like the Dalai Lama and Cornell West, and welfare experts like Dr. Temple Grandin, to try to get KFC to change its tune regarding the well-documented cruelty of its suppliers to farmed chickens. It has sent frequent letters and met with the executives of the parent company, Yum! Brands, as well as with KFC, and attended countless stockholder meetings to try to get basic welfare policies adopted. KFC at one point insisted that it was developing animal welfare standards and even put the false information on its website about them, but in reality it wasn't doing anything to improve the lives of its farmed animals.

I've participated in a number of PETA-sponsored fast food protests, including a few for KFC. Although there is nothing wrong with trying to get fast food corporations to use suppliers that treat their animals well, it's my feeling that giving fast food companies too much credit if they do something as insignificant as increasing the cage size of farmed chickens by a few inches or using a more "humane" method to kill them is only enabling the abuses of factory farming to continue.

I think the emphasis, for animal rights organizations like PETA, should be on encouraging the public to stop buying fast food from these places and to adopt vegetarianism or veganism as a more humane and healthier diet. At the very least, they should encourage consumers to purchase meat from free-range or compassionately raised animalsl Consumers should not be wasting their money enriching unethical companies like Yum! Brands, and contributing to animal abuse by patronizing fast food outlets. KFC knows that it can string PETA along forever and never adopt any of its proposed minimal welfare standards, and my guess is that, sadly, it will.

http://www.kentuckyfriedcruelty.com



Comments

with

another,

veghead's Xombytes

show me the money

It appears that the arguments presented so far support my case that slaughterhouses are unpleasant for both animals and workers. Interesting and depressing story about the legal resident who had illegal immigrants working for him, like medieval serfs.

veghead's Xombytes

a few links

You took the words right out of my mouth ;). Absolutely. Thank you.

veghead's Xombytes

human rights abuses

You really don't know about what goes on in slaughterhouses? That because they're such low-paying jobs, often desperately poor immigrants (illegal and legal) work there, and that they're required to frequent serious and disabling HUMAN injuries? That they often have to quit their jobs because of these injuries and inadequate medical coverage? Slaughterhouse work is, I believe, the most dangerous occupation in America. Do your research, please. One of the classic books about slaughterhouse abuses, which deals primarily with HUMAN, not animal, abuses, is "Slaughterhouse" by Gayle Eisnitz.

veghead's Xombytes

Great debate so far

Great debate so far :) Please do not interpret my posts as aggressive or single minded. I am a "Show me the money" type of person F. Butler Rowlett, Texas

F. Butler
Rowlett, Texas

Having worked for a Poultry

Having worked for a Poultry company for 5 years I see both sides of these stories http://www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/914415/jump "We're disappointed by the report's misleading conclusions, but not surprised given the author's extensive ties to organized labor" and "Compa worked for many years as a trade union organizer and negotiator" Pretty much all of the links above are regurgitations of the same story. The report is union biased. I am not saying that all plants are models of food processing safety. But I do know that the number of injuries at Union plants is about equal to the non-union plants. As for the illegal immigration issue, I was told by someone who still works at my former employer that they recently uncovered a operation in which someone, who is legally allowed to work in this country, came in and got a job at a plant... they showed up for orientation... but someone else showed up to do the actual job. It seems that the legal person had about 6 day jobs that he was having worked by illegal workers. And in another deal they fired 400 plant workers in a single day for mismatched social security numbers. The INS is not standing by while this is happening (though they probably are understaffed) I do know that in a single month a poultry plant hired 523 worker and had 516 terminations/Job abandonments. There are only 3 major poultry companies in the US. Tyson, Pilgrim's Pride and Sanderson Farms. All of the companies mentioned in the original post (even the ones being protested) get their chicken from the same place. The poultry companies do not have a "Torture" and "Non-Torture" processing line at their plants based on customer. Most fast food chains mentioned above have policies that prevent them from getting more than 25-35% of their chickens from 1 supplier. That way if something like the avian infuenza happened it would not wipe out their supply. F. Butler Rowlett, Texas

F. Butler
Rowlett, Texas

Here are a few links...

Human rights abuses?

Where are you getting human rights abuses out of slaughter houses? Have you ever been to a chicken plant? Are you generalizing or have you witnessed it first hand? Please elaborate more on these HUMAN rights abuses you speak of. F. Butler Rowlett, Texas

F. Butler
Rowlett, Texas

what I am saying

Humans have a choice. They can eat meat or not. You're not stuck with being an animal eater. It's not an "instinct"--LOL! So why do it, if you're swallowing animal cruelty AND human cruelty (slaughterhouses are guilty of terrible human rights abuses) along with the meat, and you can be perfectly healthy (healthier) without it? That's why I gave it up, finally, at age 50.

veghead's Xombytes

What I am saying is that

What I am saying is that Fast food chains market for the convenience of it's consumers. I actually think Chick-fil-A is one of the better "chains" in business. They only have chicken and treat their employees good As far as health, yes there are some health concerns Now to really get you fuming..... What ethics? I am a meat eater Veggies are a side dish, always have been. Someone once said "Not eating meat is a choice, eating meat is an instinct" I have many friends that are vegetarians, more power to them. I choose not to be one. Wrong or right, it is my choice. F. Butler Rowlett, Texas http://www.planetbutler.com ↑ Grab this Headline Animator

F. Butler
Rowlett, Texas

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member