LTPC: The Lost Collection
posted August 20, 2006 - 5:45pmLTPC: The Lost Collection
There is no such thing as detailed publicity. When the public is concerned, there is a source that has the capacity to display something a single certain way, and only carry an expectation for twisted interpretation. Take that in a grand scheme and one cannot say anything at all is true. Herein is the reason why I account nothing that follows as detailed. I expect nothing more than a twisted interpretation.
Ethics: False.
This is not to say that an obvious collective morality exists. Human nature(1) doesn't forbid many things, but does express warning readily. Ethics are a set of standards based on a conditioned state of thinking. As simple as "nice," or "mean," people, these criteria don't exist. There is a perfect balance in all characteristics similar to these. They have neither negative nor positive qualities, but both, and subsequently, those qualities again have both poles. Elitism is a lofty concept and should play not part in major schools of thought: society, politics, philosophy. This is not to say that someone mustn't play the role of "elitist," but it is to say that the perception of that conditioned state of mind is meant to stay out of foreign observations, calculations, or mental accomplishments.
(1) This is all assuming that human nature is a faithful part of the psyche. With collective belief, there is a power for a body, mind, or soul to be astronomically conditioned sociologically that this concept will be conjured and will remain. Based solely off of Life According to Patrick and Chris.
Limits: Truth.
The modern philosophy is a deeply rooted anger for the process of control. Human nature (See [1] under Ethics) despises the domination of another body, mind, soul or species. Men dominate women and we have activists. We have two political parties that struggle against each other for ultimate power and suggestion. We have three mentally invoked faiths who kill other people for something they cannot see. But there exists no philosophy(1) for concern of the domination of oneself. The simply put analogy(2) displays a vague summary of the concept. Choice(3) is an illusion, for we are almost wired to choose from a limited repsonse system. We "live"(4) systematically, and consciousness(5) is robotic. Arguments are encouraged, but not likely to succeed.
(1) Save that of Gustav Gurdjieff, who asserted that the actual human life exists in the unconscious and conditioning has detatched the psyche from "unlife communication," or has never learned it. (2) Humanity, as one entity, is taking thoughts, actions, and other factors of existence as seeds from an apple, each respresenting one thought or action. If humanity were to branch out, advance technologically or spiritually, we can choose the seeds from a different apple growing on the tree. If we were then to advance again, and more intensely, we may be able to choose the seeds from a different fruit, of a different tree in the orchard. The question is simple. Will we ever leave that orchard? If we do, is there simply a road with more orchards with trees with fruit with seeds? After those are explored, are there simply more roads? (3) Choice... is... an... illusion... (4) The conditioned definition of human life is conceptual consciousness. (5) As opposed to unconsciousness (See [1] regarding Gurdjieff's theories).
Motive: False
Let it be said from here on that anything conceptual is false save those concepts that counteract their own falsifying qualities. Save those that have been vaccuumed into truth. "Motive is just a word that stems from subconcious, unwarranted desires birthed from a conceptual human nature(1)."
(1) Excerpt taken from The Deeper Motives of Samantha Strong written by Patrick White and Christopher Ringkamp.
Mephisto: Truth
Based on notorious footnoting of Life According to Patrick and Chris, Mephisto(1) will be seen as turth.The theory of the Daemon(2) will state that those otherworldy starins of thinking will surpass that inherent barrier of conditioning based on the inner percentage of use of the occipital lobe(3). To be continued(***). It has been proven that if at least 31% of the 10%-18% of mental capacity is focused on the occipital lobe of the brain, even on an individual level, then the idea or concept in question will physically surpass the conditioned school. This also accounts for the truth of imagination(4).
(1) Mephisto will also desire a crackrock as a constant, as it is part of that conceptual being. (2) See Life According to Chris and Patrick: That Life which Holds Accors to the Projection of Chris Moreso than that Plane of Patrick. (3) Assuming the occipital lobe is warranted to exist, based on the factors of conditioning listed previously (See [1] of Ethics). (4) See Imagination: Turth allocated futher in the reading.
***Place originally intended for phrase to be placed. This is an exercise in "Discordant Projection," which is acceptably proper. For more information, or methodologies, see Chaos by Patrick White.

Comments
Would my sandwich then be
Would my sandwich then be cheesed?
Could I have it turkied as well?
Someone tried to tell me that the word "lion" is both singular and plural. When she was proven wrong, she defended herself stating, "The english language is adaptable."
Ah, adventures in language.
Yeah, and that could be a
Yeah, and that could be a euphemism.
It's funny when you think of it that way:
everything is then able to be code.
"Would you like cheese on that sandwich?"
Antonia Dwells
I said to someone the other
I said to someone the other day, "I western unioned you some cash." That was sexy language adaptation.
Don't mind at all. I like
Don't mind at all.
I like watching the language morph,
watching new words become verbified
in the idiom.
So let's buddy.
Antonia Dwells
I buddied you, if you don't
I buddied you, if you don't mind. I am a fan of writers that are active in online communities.
Oh... It was neither,
Oh...
It was neither, honestly.
But I can give you compliments, also.
Antonia Dwells
Huh?
I can't tell if that's a compliment or a criticism.
Oh, slack given. I have
Oh, slack given.
I have oceans of slack for you.
Antonia Dwells
This is true
I know what you mean. LTPC is a giant discordian experiment. You'll have to give it some slack. :o)
It makes sense, although "I
It makes sense, although "I didn't understand a word you just said."
Antonia Dwells
Post new comment