Microsoft accused of paying blogger to alter Wikipedia articles
posted January 24, 2007 - 2:28pmWikipedia has accused Microsoft of paying a blogger to alter technical articles on the website www.wikipedia.org.
Wikipedia considers itself an "open-source" encyclopedia and forbids people making money for writing copy on Wikipedia . In the past, Wikipedia has banned PR Firms to Campaign workers for altering content based on conflicts of interest.
"We were very disappointed to hear that Microsoft was taking that approach," Wales, who is the CEO of Wikipedia, said Tuesday.
Microsoft admits to approaching and offering to pay an "expert" to correct certain articles about Microsoft which the company believes contained inaccurate information.
Microsoft claims they had no luck in flagging the entries or emailing the inaccuracies for Wikipedia volunteers to correct.
Wales proposed the proper course would have been for Microsoft to create "white paper" on the subject with its interpretation of the facts, post it to an outside Web site and then link to it in the Wikipedia articles' discussion forums.
Recently, Wikipedia has been a hot topic on whether the website should be considered an unbiased authoritive source of information.
As of this posting the webpage entry for Microsoft on Wikipedia (www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft) displayed the following message "MICRO$OFT SUCKS!"

Comments
And the Truthiness shall Set
---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!
Micro$oft? I guess I was too late for that today.
I speak the truthiness and I
Take Wikipedia info with a large grain of salt
Post new comment