0
votes

Microsoft accused of paying blogger to alter Wikipedia articles

posted January 24, 2007 - 2:28pm
Microsoft accused of paying blogger to alter Wikipedia articles

Wikipedia has accused Microsoft of paying a blogger to alter technical articles on the website www.wikipedia.org.

Wikipedia considers itself an "open-source" encyclopedia and forbids people making money for writing copy on Wikipedia . In the past, Wikipedia has banned PR Firms to Campaign workers for altering content based on conflicts of interest.

"We were very disappointed to hear that Microsoft was taking that approach," Wales, who is the CEO of Wikipedia, said Tuesday.

Microsoft admits to approaching and offering to pay an "expert" to correct certain articles about Microsoft which the company believes contained inaccurate information.

Microsoft claims they had no luck in flagging the entries or emailing the inaccuracies for Wikipedia volunteers to correct.

Wales proposed the proper course would have been for Microsoft to create "white paper" on the subject with its interpretation of the facts, post it to an outside Web site and then link to it in the Wikipedia articles' discussion forums.

Recently, Wikipedia has been a hot topic on whether the website should be considered an unbiased authoritive source of information.

As of this posting the webpage entry for Microsoft on Wikipedia (www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft) displayed the following message "MICRO$OFT SUCKS!"



Comments

And the Truthiness shall Set

And the Truthiness shall Set You Free What do You Think? Join Xomba to Tell Us! (Or Not ... jic you're one of the sheep)

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

Micro$oft? I guess I was too late for that today.

Someday, I will have to tell you about my two-day relationship with Bill Gates back then. I'm sure he would not remember it. At least, well, I would be surprised. . .if he remembered. But it does remind me of the time when I was all outfitted and dressed like you describe as appropriately, for a government science meeting, and was greeting speakers and guests. Then THE Director of the whole Division walked in. Several years before, I had strapped him into a helicopter after having my work interrupted so a higher ranked colleague could go joy ride with this Wheel. When I pulled the shoulder straps over him and buckled them, he asked. "What are these for?" "It is rough up there," I said. "Dangerous winds. These will keep you from getting tossed around in the seat if it gets to throwing the ship around violently. And they might save your life if you crash." All true. Only some tongue in cheek. It was a very windy day and dangerous flying in the mountains. I had never seen anyone turn that ghost white, that fast. I said. "Sir, you'll be fine! Paul here, is a good pilot!" He got his color back, as soon as they landed thirtysix minutes later (0.6 hours on the Hobbs meter.) I watched his color come back; when they touched down he was still as white as he had been at takeoff. Years went by. I'm at the meeting and greeting. He could not have recognized me as dashingly conservative and precisely dressed and cut as I was then. I stuck out my hand, said,"Sir, I don't expect you will remember me. . .but. . ." "Oh. I remember you, Les . . ."He said. Damn! How could he. "You made quite an impression on me..." Oh, how I wished I hadn't. . .or he didn't. What did he remember about me? ============ They took the "$" sign down? I agree, but I should have asked Bill for a job back then. . . They were still small then. Good story. Microsoft could probably make wiki an offer that might be hard to refuse. But not sure how Bill would figure how to make it pay. Something, like advertising? . . .

I speak the truthiness and I

I speak the truthiness and I live in Wikiality.

Take Wikipedia info with a large grain of salt

Wikipedia is a great concept and I visit it often...as a first step for finding information. I'm kind of shocked to hear students using it as their one-and-only research tool, because it's so easy to manipulate it, since anyone can edit it. Yes, as Wales says, they have staff and many volunteers vetting the content, but not nearly enough to handle all the changes coming in. And yes, articles on major topics may be reviewed pretty quickly and misinformtion corrected. But I've seen facts that are flat-out wrong stay there for many months. To read about a deliberate act of Wikipedia vandalism that made false statements about a person and stayed undetected for far too long, Google the terms "John Seigenthaler, Sr." "wikipedia" and "hoax." Or just look up his name in Wikipedia; there's an article on the hoax there.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member