Newsweek has published in a recent article, seemingly questioning Jenny McCarthy's testimony of healing her son from Autism. Jenny was invited on "Oprah's show back in 2007. Apparently, since there wasn't adequate "opposing" views from "Credible" Doctors, Newsweek wants to cast an air of incredibility on Jenny's claims of her son being cured from this debilitating disease.

Jenny gave her testimony and experience in her journey to help her son. To snuff it off as quack, discredits Newsweek's claim of being an informative credible media outlet.

Does Newsweek’s writers even take the time to do investigative research on these claims? If they only deliver and publish articles on information at face value then their final published drafts will mostly lien toward bias. At face value, Jenny can only give you an overview of her testimony, it's up to you to inquire further, like she did if Newsweek wants to truly understand where she is at. Oprah's show is only an hour long. I've researched Autism and it took me some time to come up with enough information to uncover where Autism really comes from. It takes research because the information is purposely being covered up to protect Corporate interests. Major media interests who receive millions of dollars from Pharmaceutical companies are happy to keep it that way and will report and publish articles to try to discredit anyone who has journeyed too far down the "Rabbit Hole" to uncover their dirty little secrets of profiting from disease.

There does not have to be "opposition" voices, if the claim is already true and proven. Jenny is just delivering the facts that are already proven and documented. You would do your own research too. If you seek truth. Jenny did hers.

If Newsweek gets their way then, it's like sitting in math class at school and a fair "Opposing" voice echos from the corner of the room "Does 2 + 2 really equal 4. I don't think it adds up. I oppose! The Autism/Mercury link is already proven! Opposing voices in this matter are just added to create confusion and try to discredit truth to protect hidden parties that are profiting from disease. Which unfortunately, is a very profitable business in America.

I know media propaganda when I see it and Newsweek plays it very well here. You can't pay Katie Couric's $8 million dollar salary a year without Pharmaceutical advertising dollars. You just can't. Pharmaceutical advertising dollars are where most of media syndicates profits come from. Why "Cure" the cash cow? If it's broke then Don't fix it, mentality is prominent in this demented philosophy.

I have followed Jenny's testimony for years. My nephew was born with Autism. So this was an issue I paid very close attention to. I have also heard the voices of many parents who have fought to get Mercury out of vaccines for years. These parents did their research. Can Newsweek silence their voices too? How can Newsweek be so disconnected from the voice of the people? How could you not even care for the views of the subscribers who subscribe to your publication? Newsweek seems very disconnected from the public. Newsweek proves itself unloyal to their loyal customer base. People want truth and not common, corporate friendly propaganda. Newsweek loses credibility here. They are not being a listening ear to up-to-date revealing facts and findings in the medical community. It be at best for Newsweek not to publish or comment with any opposing articles on any medical claims that just expose their writers ignorance in the matter of medical science. Since Newsweek seems to be lacking in common medical proven and documented facts that's already out there.

It is true and proven that vaccines and Autism are connected. Mercury is the second most toxic substance known to man. Fluoride being even more poisonous then Mercury and debilitating. Yes, the same Fluoride found in toothpaste and drinking water. Yes, it's researched and proven too and causes many debilitating diseases. But that's another article.

Mercury shouldn't be consumed at any time. It does not belong in the body. Research has been done and documented on the harmful effects of Mercury. But, because the findings are controversial and very incriminating to Pharmaceutical companies and proves that Pharmaceutical companies are injuring, maiming and killing their consumers on purpose for profit and gain, the findings are buried and hidden so people can't find them, unless they seriously look. The Pharmaceutical companies are not going to research and convict themselves and the FDA is paid hand in pocket to cover and protect their financial purses that they receive from the Pharmaceutical companies. This right here is a conflict of interest, criminal and unethical. Also, the government will not allot the millions of dollars for ongoing research, because they fair to lose out financially too. Pharmaceutical lobbyists have some of our elected officials in their back pocket. So private funded research is made with limited funds and since their findings are not supported by the general medical community, the FDA, Pharmaceutical, Doctors and media, they all turn a blind eye and say the studies were never documented (They mean "Never documented by them-as if they would ever try to indiscriminately incriminate themselves) or is unsubstantial.

The media takes advantage of the fact that the general public is distracted (with bells and whistles of media hype) from following this ongoing, commonly practiced abuse of corporate/government liaison of power and greed.

People believe in the separation of Church and State. Proper meaning is that the State should never dictate how a person serves and worships their God. That's a personal relationship. Well, I also believe in the separation of Corporate interests and State. Sorry Merck and the rest of the corporate most likely suspects. Not here. Corporations should never write internal laws and approach our Government to support and back up these laws that are written by businesses to profit that business and therefore disenfranchising the general public. Government serves the people. Government should not be serving the corporate giants. Just as people should not be serving the Government either. The Government was created to serve the people. Who rearranged the pecking order? Internal and external power and money hungry self serving men who have snubbed up their noses at serving the public. Political officials are "Public Servants". It's easy to fall into the endless lies of false claims of incurable diseases because of this. Why would they want to cure a disease or even make the cure known and lose out on billions of dollars in profit. To the Merck and the other corporate pharmaceutical giants, millions of deaths is a lose they are willing to take if it can pad their pockets. There are heartless men who worship their own god-money.

Autism is a prime money maker for them. And it supports our governments population control efforts. It's the perfect sinister, twisted, sick marriage. This is one marriage I know God did not ordain. I do believe that God would allow divorce in this particular situation. It's justifiable in God's court. We are on our own to seek out the truth in healing. Jenny is on the right path. Expect opposition. "They" don't want to lose any profits with this "Healing" silly business. There is no profit in that. They know they can't make one dime off of a healthy body. Still, they seem to have found a way around that with "Prevention from ever getting a disease pharmaceutical drugs" for healthy people to take to avoid getting a disease with a disclousure, oh, you still might possibly get it anyway. Another twisted gimmick that seems to be profiting for them too.

The media and pharmaceutical advertisers know how to play off of peoples fear of "Getting" a disease. They are playing with your heads people. This reminds me of a statement I heard awhile back. "It's easy to control peoples minds. And they wouldn't even know that they are being controlled." Now that's scary.

And, just the recent declaration of the FDA as claiming that mercury is safe is criminal and purposefully vicious. This lie right here has sealed the fate of many others being seriously injured by this poisonous metal. It is not safe for a pregnant woman to consume mercury. The FDA knows to play off the ignorance of the public, because many people are not educated on the fact that mercury is a toxic, deadly substance. I am so glad that in school, Chemistry was one of my favorite subjects. Learning the Table of Elements and being very interested in the chemical properties of these substances was very intriguing to me. These chemical compounds can be put together in so many different puzzle combinations some with amazing chemical effects. Mercury being an element we were warned not to even touch because it can seep through your skin and poison us. You don't remember that when you went to school? That's if you took Chemistry. It's a very enlightening course.

I worked for some years in the dental industry as a dental assistant. Many times the dentist would tell me not to touch the mercury when I was mixing it for mercury fillings because it was very poisonous. There was always a conflict in my head that burned in my conscience. Then why are we putting it in peoples mouths if it is so poisonous? And, I suddenly remembered what I already knew about this poisonous metal. Even when it hardens, it still seeps steadily into the body causing cancer, heart problems, autism, etc...I left that industry.

Since Newsweek feels that Oprah's TV Show segment with Jenny McCarthy was "Unfair" My personal findings and experience is probably unfair too, I took the liberty to post a video link from a "credible" doctor giving his testimony how he healed his son from Autism. Dr. Russell Blaylock's son developed Autism after his wife took their son to receive "Vaccinations". He also tells us that his wife has a mouthful of mercury fillings and how this was also a factor in his sons development of this disease. He documented, treated his son and other children, many being cured from his findings. Even one of his "Cured" patients addressed his convincing testimony and the dangers of mercury in vaccines publicly in Washington DC in a political forum.

So Newsweek, here is a "credible" doctor speaking his findings on mercury poisoning. Also, any opposing doctors are now deemed "not credible" Because Dr. Russell Blaylock came across these "Educated Doctors" who "none" could help his son because they were all "Ignorant" of the serious damage that mercury causes. So Dr. Russell Blaylock took matters into his own hands. Oh, like Jenny did. How interesting that they "both" came to the same conclusion. That there is an Autism/Mercury link. You don’t need to be a doctor after all to do legitimate research and document the findings and have proven results.

"The Controversial Columnist"

Today's Quotes: "When in doubt, seek it out."

"Truth is most times hidden. Lies are most commonly found on the surface."

I have also attached a video link here showing mercury destroying brain neurons. Medically known as the "neurodegenerative" properties of mercury.

Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKuznYVn40s

To my readers.

So please remember to ask your doctor questions. We as patients have that right. Do not be intimidated. It's your body. It's your life. It's your child's life. Ask them, What did they learn about mercury in medical school when you are approaching them with a child with Autism. This is important information that your doctor should know. Their response should be a prime indicator if they are educated enough concerning the possible cause and treatment of Autism to deal with this patient or in fact their "Opposing" response may cause you to seek a second opinion. It is "documented" in the medical world that mercury is a toxic, neurodegenerative substance. So who are these "opposing" doctors anyway? Are they that disconnected from medical industry common known mercury toxin neurodegenerative facts? Or this knowledge being hidden from them too? Pharmaceutical companies are also major contributors of monetary funding received by medical colleges and universities. Again, question their underlying motives or their education. If they "oppose" the most obvious facts then it leads us to question their text book studies that are written and approved by pharmaceutical corporations for medical studies and important medical facts that are also being buried that if the doctor doesn't do his own independant research may very well go overlooked here too.

Dr. Russell Blaylock stesses in his own testimony the ignorance of doctors, his own medical peers, concerning the "Autism/Mercury Link" that he was once ignorant of.

The Controversial Columnist
PRESS RELEASE: www.prlog.org/10252083