Let us now move into philselfological dimensions of peaceful horizon as pivot in the gloabl literary and education systems, demanding our attention, thus in one of the most important issues of education and it is the methods of teaching and Philselfology. The teacher is a conductor of education who checks every student and it is also acceptable that the students also evaluate their every teacher. So both method of teaching and method of learning are equally important. Thus the good teacher will be the one who may not only know what to teach, but will be sure what to learn, in other words the one who knows that a teacher is also a learner is a good teacher.

The good learner will always believe that others know something more than him or her whereas the odd teacher or person would think that others know nothing more than him or her.

It is easy to teach, but it is hard to learn that is why great learner has always been great teachers.

We have observed many times that students begin to dislike certain subjects because of the teachers. And this problem is very common and thus available in almost all educational institutions. It is not students fault because innocent should be least blamed though the students' have their own negative role in the disliking of the subject. Let us try to consider this problem in the light of Philselfology.

As Philselfology is science (study) of love of self-orientation with creative thinking and the scientific feelings, and in particularly the self-study, so it would imply that teacher may first look at his or her own self study bases and analyze it so that the taste and hunger of self-study should be taught along with subject study material. In teaching, telling, explaining and demonstrating is very important but it is not significant without inspiring students.

Let us try to unify four apexes of education: the teacher, the taught, the subject and methods of evaluation as we may view it in Philselfology. We will mainly focus on teaching and its relation with four apexes of education. All the schools of Philosophy argue about the most important of these four apexes. One school would claim teachers as most important, the second one would claim the taught as the most important and there are others who will claim either subject or evaluation as supreme.

We accept that goodness, , beauty, greatness and other such qualities, virtues, potentialities, capacities, capabilities, abilities, possessions are relative and dependent on each other and one-another otherwise they will be meaningless and of no importance.

If everyone is rich, it will lose its meaning, and if everyone is a player of football it will loose its importance.

Thus, the things become important, valuable and significant because they are more important, valuable and significant than what we possess. Teachers can never be least important and they are never out of our lives. When we get conceived, parents and or guardians are our teachers; no school of Philosophy can reject it. When we go to school, college, university we have teachers and when we grow and do jobs or business our seniors and experts become our teachers and in old age nature and great and grand people become our teachers.

Similarly all that we share with others for conception to cremation is our philselfological contribution to others.