Yes...you're right. I'm overly emotional. As you can see above, I wasn't the one who decided to complain about anyone being "an apologist for this regime" and using the same tired rhetoric about losing our constitutional rights - in response to a comment about sports fans not respecting the president at a baseball game. The reason you don't reply to my articles (not that I care anyway) is because everytime you do, you demonstrate your inability to comprehend the law and official government documents. I didn't "back a bad horse." I backed the correct decision - the legally justified decision and the morally right decision. You can argue all you want, but you have no evidence to the contrary. And I couldn't care less what your opinion is. What matters is whether or not you can back up your claims with facts. And I said facts, not conspiracy theories or conjecture from irrelevant websites. That's the difference between me and you. I use the law and official documents, treaties, charters, court decisions, etc. to explain my position - you use opinions from socialist and anti-war websites. So, you'll have to excuse me if I, for some unknown reason don't concede my arguments to you at every turn. Basically, I don't take too kindly to ignorance or stupidity, especially when someone tries to challenge my position with faulty logic and obscure sources. In that sense, yes, I am quite intolerant of the opinions from "people like you." *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.