0
votes

Respecting our Soldiers

posted January 1, 2007 - 8:29am
Respecting our Soldiers

In late December, the number of American deaths in Iraq matched the total deaths of September 11, 2001. That total was 2,973. By January 1, 2007, it reached 3,000. Those figures mean everything and nothing.

Each death means everything to the loved ones and friends of the serviceman or woman killed. That death creates a permanent void and scar in their memories. Mothers and fathers, brothers, sisters and friends know that every time they think of that fallen soldier, it's now in the past tense. They might think back to their last conversations or further back, when that “casualty” was in diapers or perhaps in grade school. But they all know their soldier is a memory, never to see life again. Their fond memories will always come with the painful memory of that untimely death.

For the country, these numbers mean nothing. Why would 2,973 mean more than 2,972? Why is 3,000 more important than 2,999? Every war, good or bad, brings death. It may be terrible, but it's not about to change. When people say “no more war”, they might as well say “no more air”. It's been with humanity from day one and will be with us until our last day on earth. It’s part of our nature and isn't about to change.

What matters isn't whether the death count in Iraq matches the death count of 9/11. Our local paper, Newsday, made that fact its front-page story, as did many across the country. It showed nothing except the shallow stupidity of those papers. Within its pages of coverage, Newsday used that statistic to imply it was now time to get out of Iraq. If that logic were applied to World War II, what would have been the result? How about the American Revolution or Civil War? The humans behind the numbers are important. The numbers alone are empty space fillers.

If the war is to be judged, it should be judged on its purpose and whether it's meeting that purpose. War's a cold, bloody fact of life that causes pain and sacrifice. We should talk about whether it’s just, whether we’re accomplishing what we set out to do, whether it’s part of a larger cause, whether it’s hurting or helping us to be there. It shouldn't be treated like a home run contest that tells the world Bobby Bonds passed Babe Ruth on the all-time list. Ultimately, that means nothing. To judge a war as we would a sports event trivializes and insults those who have sacrificed their well-being and their lives.

www.xomba.com/xombyte/thewonderer

Technorati Profile

Add to Technorati Favorites



Comments

Thanks Jim, I hope so too.

Thanks Jim, I hope so too. Politicians and the public had better wake up and start taking this war more seriously and debate the issues instead of reducing it to election soundbites. We need to discuss and debate the outcomes of this war, both good and bad.

Respecting our Soldiers

Great article. I would like to add it should not be for furthering a political agenda at the soldiers’ expense either. We are in a position now, same as during Vietnam. A Republican administration, with a Democrat Congress that pulls the purse strings. We may win the battles, but lose the war, just so politicians can win elections. Time will tell lets hope history does not repeat itself.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member