0
votes

Stand Up for Our Furred Friends on Fur-Free Friday,the Day After Thanksgiving

posted November 19, 2007 - 3:54pm
Stand Up for Our Furred Friends on Fur-Free Friday,the Day After Thanksgiving

Animal advocates all over the U.S. gather together in front of their local fur purveyors the day after Thanksgiving every year on Fur-Free Friday, a nationally recognized and respected animal rights day of protest, with signs and informational pamphlets urging consumers not to wear fur or fur trim.

Fur-Free Friday originated in 1986, when two members of the animal advocacy group Trans-Species Unlimited (TSU) decided to stage a non-violent protest on the busiest shopping day of the year. The year before, TSU and another group called Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade (CAFT) had sponsored a day of civil disobedience in front of Macy’s in New York and Sacramento, California. Despite the non-violent nature of the protests, a number of participants were arrested.

Fur-Free Friday has been very successful in raising public awareness about the cruel realities of the fur trade. But in the last few years, the fur industry has been fighting back by enticing consumers into buying fur-trimmed items like hats, gloves, coats and jackets.

The big problem with fur trim is that, even though it may be labeled “raccoon” or “faux fur”, the trim may actually be from domesticated dogs or cats, wolves or wild raccoon dogs (also known as Finn raccoons), especially if it comes from China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and other Asian countries. In these countries, the raising and slaughtering (often by skinning alive) of dogs and cats for their fur is a huge industry. Although it is illegal to import dog or cat fur into the U.S., many stores and designers are doing it anyway, either knowingly or out of ignorance.

What can you do as a consumer to stop the mislabeling of fur trim? Write to your Congressional representative to support The Truth in Fur Labeling Act (HR 4904), which would close a loophole in the 1950s Fur Products Labeling Act that does not require labeling of fur items if the value of the fur is less than $150. In other words, merchants can now legally sell fur trim without specifying the species, country of origin or even identifying the trim as animal. Representative Jim Moran of Virginia is working hard to close this loophole.

In the meantime, the most humane action you can take is to avoid buying fur trim and inform department store managers if you suspect that they’re selling mislabeled fur items. And get out there on Fur-Free Friday with your fellow animal lovers to protest the animal-cruel fur industry, which operates on the bizarre premise that trapping wild animals, or electrocuting farmed animals, and stripping them of their own skin and fur just so humans can wear it is perfectly reasonable. The fur business is a billion-dollar industry. You can help change that by being a responsible consumer.



Comments

dissolve

the

veghead's Xombytes

plants vs animals

Wow! There's somebody out there older than I am, besides my mother? Amazing! ;) Angel, I stick to my belief that humans are not natural predators/hunters because they require "utensils" to kill. I was into the New Age decades ago myself, and still dabble in it. But it disturbs me that so-called enlightened people still think it's OK to slaughter animals (whether in factory farming or in hunting) when they can raise their spiritual vibrations just by not eating animal corpses. Even Shirley MacLaine doesn't get the connection, for all her spiritual strivings. BTW, one of the many things that bothers me about hunters is their claim that they are conservationists because they keep down the deer population, for example. Well, deer are plentiful precisely because hunters have pretty much killed off (or severely reduced) their natural predators. And also, we way-too-plentiful humans have moved in and taken over their territories. If hunters were really sincere about being conservationists, they would support birth control for deer and also birth control for humans. So-called "civilization" has brought a lot of evils into the world, unfortunately. Sometimes I think it should be called "institutionalized barbarism" instead of "civilization". I have nothing against Native Americans, but I believe that the word "tradition" has created a lot of harm in the world where animals are concerned. I don't know how many times I've heard people try to justify an animal-cruel practice by declaring it's their "tradition", so it must be OK. The truth is that there are good traditions and bad traditions. It's not a neutral word. A current example is whale hunting in Japan. Whale hunters insist they do it because of tradition, and that anyone who opposes them is racist. Cockfighters in my state, New Mexico, used the same argument to try to legally protect their "tradition". Ultimately they failed. I look forward to a time when humans make ethical decisions based on compassion, not on "tradition" or selfishness. Happy Thanksgiving. I'm going to a casino buffet with my mother and husband, where I can fill up on veggie dishes and they can stuff themselves with you-know-what.

veghead's Xombytes

Plants Vs Animals

You are so right about the average diet today. The things we are doing to our food with chemical additives, poor animal husbandry practices, farming practices that focus on production rather than nutritional components, and the extreme processing of so much of our food, combined with poor food choices does result in much of our diet being toxic and unhealthy. You are also right that man could not feed himself as a hunter without tools, just as man could not grow enough food to feed himself without tools. The invention of the plow is seen as pivotal in the development of civilization. However, I am afraid that the days of my making life choices prior to the age of 50 are many, many years past. I was involved in the New Age movement more than 40 years ago, when it actually was "New". Much of that philosophy I found to be in harmony with my Celtic heritage and not new at all, even then. My husband and my sons share a Native American heritage and during the 35 years of our marriage, I have developed a profound respect for their belief in the Spiritual Nature of the world. Our combined heritages harmonize well and share many common beliefs about the spiritual nature of plants, animals, artifacts and places. We each choose what path we travel through life on our jounrey to wisdom. You have chosen your path and I respect your right to make that choice. You walk the path that is right for you, just as I walk the path that is right for me. We have shared with each other our beliefs and reasons for our choices, so that we may better understand each other. I wish you well on your journey. Angel

plants vs animals

What more can I say, Angel? Now you're nit picking, but I understand where you're coming from, because believe me, I've been there. I’ve heard variations of your argument before. It sounds like a combination of Native American/New Age beliefs to me. Like you, I did a hell of a lot of rationalizing of my ethical choices before I committed to veganism when I was 50. I even tried to convince myself that it’s an unhealthy diet, that it’s too low in protein, and that I would die of malnutrition if I became a vegan. Well, it isn’t, and I didn’t. For one thing, I had no symptoms of menopause. While I don’t believe that veganism is strictly “natural”, neither is wolfing down mega-burgers, pizzas, barbecue, fried chicken: you know, all the toxic ingredients of the Standard American Diet (SAD). You are correct about humans being omnivores, but most humans eat far too many animals. That's why there is so much heart disease, cancer, obesity, etc., etc. As with any diet, you need to be careful about getting enough vitamins, minerals, etc. But I don't regret my choice, ethically, gastronomically or nutritionally. There are plenty of vegetables, grains, beans, fruits, etc., out there to make my diet a richer one than the average so-called "omnivore". It's always been difficult for me to stick to a nutritional regimen, and yet, once I decided that I could no longer kid myself about the realities of animal exploitation, I had no problem becoming a vegan and staying one. It's the right thing to do. As for humans being predators, hunters should realize that if it weren't for their weaponry, binoculars, funny whistles and scents that they buy at Wal-mart to attract animals, their camouflage clothing, their hunting blinds, and all the other accoutrements of their murderous trade, they couldn't catch a damn thing, much less kill it. Sometimes they even shoot each other, they're so inept (remember Dick Cheney?). Most hunters couldn't even wrestle a harmless deer to the ground. So humans are not natural predators. That was my point. I think you misunderstood. I think I’ve pretty much heard it all in the arguments against veganism. I've heard yours before too. I’ve even been called a plant murderer by hunter types! So if I’m a vegicidal maniac, so be it. It’s a lot better than the alternative! Thanks for your input. I do hope that you change your mind about veganism (and that you don't wait until you're 50!).

veghead's Xombytes

Plants Vs Animals

Actually, plants die very slowly after being disconnected from their root systems. Many of them can be revived and live on if they are placed in water or moist soil. They simply grow new roots. And you are right, humans are neither carnivores nor herbivores. They are omnivores, which gives them a survival advantage during times of shortages as they can switch from one food group to another as need dictates. There is also significant genetic drift within the species, so that what may be an ideal diet for one person, is not physiologically good for another. There have been many studies done on this and many are currently ongoing as we try to determine exactly what role diet plays in our health. Nature has laid before us a bountiful harvest table. I am thankful that a place has been set for me at that table. I agree that whatever foods we choose from that table should be raised and harvested in a respectful and compassionate manner, be they plants or animals. I am very much at peace with the food choices I make. Angel

plants vs animals

You could be right, Angel, that plants have feelings--or it could just be a simple reaction to stimuli. I remember there was a famous book written about that very subject back in the 70s. But their physiology is just not as complex as animals', and that's scientific fact. Be that as it may, humans have to eat something to survive--they can't just live on air--and eating plants is, in my mind, much more humane than eating animals. I think that because humans have a choice (they have evolved enough to think about what they eat), they should choose the most compassionate diet. And that is veganism, in my opinion. Yes, many wild animals are killed by accident in plant agriculture. There is no diet out there that does not involve some animal killing, either directly or indirectly. But deliberately raising bioengineered slave animals to eat in factory farming, or going out and shooting animals for sport rather than subsistence, is far worse ethically, in my opinion. I'm comfortable with my decision to be a vegan, and I assume you are with yours. That's the important thing. And I'm glad that you're at least not defending the killing of animals for their fur. But, with all due respect, it really sounds to me like you're trying to make an excuse for your own animal consumption. Humans are not anatomically predators. What makes them predators is their weaponry (knives, guns, etc.) and their brains. Their bodies are not equipped to be predators: they have small teeth, bad hearing and bad vision compared to real predators, can't run fast, have long digestive tracts, etc. When you think about it, humans are technically prey animals that have survived by their wits (and sometimes with the help of real predators, like dogs and wolves). That's another reason I think vegetarianism and veganism are appropriate diets for humans. We don't fit easily into an evolutionary niche. We're kind of a borderline species that's still evolving, and we have a choice as to the direction we evolve. Why not evolve in the direction of compassion? It doesn't have to be a "dog eat dog" world. BTW, plants are no longer alive after they are disconnected from their root systems. And I think you're taking the moral high ground by assuming that I don't appreciate all that I eat. Of course I do. I have done so for 58 years.

veghead's Xombytes

Plants vs Animals

Just because we can not explain how the plant feels or reacts does not mean that they don't. In fact, we have much scientific evidence that plants feel and have emotions, as well as reactions to painful stimuli. You can prove it to yourself... many have. Place two plants under the same light, moisture, and soil conditions and speak kindly to one and hatefully to the other and the one that you speak to affectionately will out grow the other. Works with different styles of music also. As humans, we are quick to discount those things we do not understand, like the spirit nature of plants and animals. All life lives off the death of other life, whether that life is plant or animal. There is no moral or ethical high ground here in preferring to eat one or the other for reasons of compassion. The truly compassionate soul regrets the necessity of taking life but realizes that it is necessary and is thankful for the sacrifice of that life. Prey animals have an obligation to struggle and to fight so that only the strongest prey will survive and keep the species strong and that only the strongest predators will survive to keep their species strong. Every living being has a place in the order of things and nature keeps it all in balance. It is a very elegant system. You are, of course, free to choose your own diet. However, the next time you crunch down on a living stalk of celery, you might take a moment to mention to the spirit of that being you are eating alive that do appreciate that it is giving its life that you might continue yours. Angel

The turkey knows?

Angel, you're getting a bit too mystical for me. If the "spirit" of the animal really believed that it was created to be eaten, then it wouldn't struggle to live when its life is about to be taken away. It would just lie down and wait to be eaten. All animals want to continue living. In every nature film I've ever seen, the prey desperately tries to escape the predator because it wants to live just as much as the predator does. And the same thing happens in a slaughterhouse, where the predator is a human wielding a knife. In the case of humans, the "sad fact of life that one life must end to promote the well being of another life" is something that we can change. Humans have the ability to make ethical decisions, so we have a choice in whether we kill our fellow animals or not, and in what we eat. Other predators do not. And taking the life of a plant is not the same thing as taking the life of an animal. Plants do not have the kind of nervous systems that allow them to feel pain. But you're right, wasting life, whether it's plant or animal, is never a good thing.

veghead's Xombytes

Fur vs Feathers

No big difference to me. The only reason to hunt animals for food is if you find yourself in a situation where you will starve if you don't kill an animal, as in subsistence hunting. Any other hunting is for trivial reasons, like sport or trophies.

veghead's Xombytes

I don't disagree

I do not hunt (nor would I unless I had to do it to put food on the table), but I do have hunters in the family, so I get the hunting/ornament argument from both sides. I've heard so many different things said about it from all sides, that I have to go with what feels right deep in my soul.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member