The Christiam Myth
posted October 29, 2006 - 9:47pmReligion and history has always been sort of fuzzy. There's never really any proof for the accounts they preach as truth. In my reading up on spirituality, i was struck by the idea that its possible for the identity of Jesus is not one man, but many. The council at Nicea was the birthplace of conventional christianity. Gospels and other inclusions to the Bible were voted on in terms of validity of accounts, but also what those in power wanted to convey to keep a patriarchal society.
I wondered if a comparison could be made between Jesus and Don Juan from the Carlos Castaneda series, where Don Juan was a man but many different holy seers, and in some accounts, total fiction. Castaneda lost credibility, but the real meat of what he was saying was how to live a good life, how to the right path, how to gain higher consciousness. In contrast, we as westerners look upon the greek myths with great admiration, they are romanticized, and they are told with the same intent as the Don Juan tales. Yet for some reason there isn't the same kind of damnation Castaneda brought upon himself.
Jesus is not a man in the lives of the people who worship him, he is a mythic figure. People will recount his actions in the same way the greeks would recount the tales of their gods, but the greeks understood something that many christians do not. They never took their myths to heart as fact, just sort of guidelines to live by. The stories in the old testament are just as impossible in nature as those of Zeus banishing Hades to the underworld, or as Aman-Ra over seeing the egyptian people.
This is merely a rhetorical question, doubtful to ever be answered. But is Jesus the myth the same as Jesus the man? And in that light should we view him as a path to truth, or just some guidelines to live by?

Comments
Christ
Good Question
Post new comment