"They" are Part One and Part Two; part three is "me" ("you" when you are the writer).

This is basicly what I do with Parts One and -Two: After writing an article and copying it to my Clipboard, I go to the tool in part one, click on the second tab there, open the 'full text' window and paste the Clipboarded text in.

That gives me a list of possible keywords, with a couple of popularity-ratings for each (among searchers and among 'message-havers'). I scroll through this list, selecting keywords I agree apply to the article (`coz some o` the keywords that show up don't apply to the article the way I meant it).

Through the button beneath the selected-words, I get to a screen that asks me if I have a website; I tell it 'yes,' and go through the next button which takes me to the page with the list on it (a couple screens down).

I select/copy/paste the list and edit it from list- to code-form.

Then I copy the first of those keywords to my clipboard and paste it into the second tool. That (if I make sure it only delivers "the misspelled word" [no quote-marks]) gives me a list of misspelled keywords, which I copy/paste with the first list of keywords and which I edit into code-form.

'Edit into code-form:' that brings me to the first reason I'd ask the webmasters of the tools above to provide the lists in code-form—save me half-an-hour-a-day.

The other reason is that 'I'm too lazy' (the reason for MOST computer-programs, right?) to integrate all the misspelled words through out the standing list of correctly-spelled ones.

That is to say, if A-D were the words I had found (seperated by commas) and w-z were four of the misspelling-methods tool-2 used, then the first eight keywords would be A, Aw, B, Ax, C, Ay, D, and Az.

(I don't use tool-1 as an example because its writers mean their lists of words as 'words for sale,' and I'm afraid they would think I were offering to buy the words if I tried to tell them how to list them.... What a wuss I am, sometimes!)