Oh, we can claim to; and He forgives us for it ... but any human claiming to know God is like a toddler claiming to be highly-experienced in coital manuevers! Uncle MythMan---His Mission? http://www.xomba.com/the_new_mythman_plan ----------P.S. Heavenly HotGirl33705 knows that YOU CAN'T MAKE MONEY HERE! but you can let people grant you great wealth! Search around to find out how! ---Write-in Elizabeth Kucinich!

You are asking the wrong questions while you are answering none. Your beliefs of God rely on Biblical texts, and you accept these texts because you believe it to be the word of God. This is what one would call "begging the question." It is an entirely fallacious argument. Your entire list of questions is irrelevant. You missed the point. Your beliefs are simply the result of religious evolution. In none of your comments do you acknowledge the points I've made previously. That is, your assumptions about God do not stand up to any reasonable analysis. The attributes that are assigned to God can be exposed to contradictions. I've pointed a few of them out. Until you can acknowledge these points, there's nothing more we can do here. Your line of questions are based entirely on Biblical "proofs." None of my answers will matter unless they are consistent with what the Bible deems accurate, or "true." It's completely illogical. "Why do articles against God go straight to the top of the list and an article for God get poor ratings but seventy replies?" I don't know - perhaps the same reason why articles that support the Democrat/socialist agenda get higher ratings and attention than articles that oppose it. It's an up-hill battle that I've been fighting for nearly two years...with little results. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.

I have studied the "word of God" - I had over eight years of Catholic school and have been through the Bible several times over. I've studied religion since then and I know both sides of the argument, which is why I'm able to sort through the nonsense and recognize what is and what isn't. The "word of God" is simply words from men. "Divine viewpoint" is human viewpoint. God did not write the Old Testament. Jesus did not write the New Testament. The Church made the Bible what it is. I'm not sure why it's so hard for people to understand that. The Tanakh, the Bible, the Qur'an, the Vedic scriptures, the Sutras...it doesn't matter what religion and it doesn't matter which book - they're all written by man, all a creation of man. If you knew the histories of the various religions, you would be able to see that there is not much that is entirely unique to any of them. The Abrahamic religions borrowed from Egyptian mythology, Zoroastrianism, the Dravidians, the Sumerians...The Hindu religions borrowed from the Dravidians, the Sumerians, and the Eastern religions...Just about every one of those have roots in animism, astrology, and pagan beliefs. It's been a gradual evolution probably since our early ancestors first became self-aware. What you "know" about God and your spirituality is simply what you have been taught through "scripture." I know these comments are mostly futile for me to make, but it's important that you at least understand where your beliefs came from. If you cannot understand or accept the roots of your religion or acknowledge why it came to be, then you will never fully comprehend just what religion/spirituality is supposed to be. And if youre not willing to acknowledge that when we attribute certain qualities to the divine entities we believe in, then that divinity will be exposed to logical criticism - because at that point, it becomes a human manifestation. Believing in Jesus or any god will not make me enlightened and it will not make me see the unseeable. It will simply make me a product of faith. I've been down that road and nothing came of it except an unwillingness to look beyond what was taught as "truth." The "word of God" will always be a mystery to me...because I am merely a finite being trying to grasp the word of an infinite god. And talking in circles is not something that I should be concerned about. I know the beginning and end of my arguments. I have yet to see you point out the flaws in them - even when they are based on your premises. You simply introduce another purely faith-based element (the Holy Spirit) and claim that it can't be known by people who don't already believe in the religious philosophy that created it. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.

"Spiritual understands spiritual" - Just like rational understands rational, logical understands logical, and reasonable understands reasonable? Do you freely admit that faith and belief are not grounded in fact or critical thinking? I find it fascinating (and humorous) that we can agree on an initial premise, but then your ensuing deductive logic fails miserably. This must be where your faith kicks in. All of your preconceived notions about God and spirituality prevent you from making logical connections...even within your own set of premises. You have yet to make a plausible response to any of the comments I've made. And when you do, you come up with something like this: "That is why the Holy Spirit is the interpreter." So, in addition to relying purely on preconceived notions of God and spirituality - which are merely a product of the organized Church, I might add - now you have introduced the realm of the paranormal. And you use a ghost as the basis for this comment: "Now that we have negated the point your comment was based upon there is no more need to dissect the rest of your reply." Nothing has been "negated" by that reply. You have simply made the argument more ambiguous and reliant on additional preconceived beliefs. At this point, I'm not even sure that spiritual can understand spiritual. *If you're interested in reading my articles, Click Here.