0
votes

Time For Marijuana Legalization?

posted February 25, 2009 - 2:46pm
Time For Marijuana Legalization?

I've long believed the criminalization of marijuana was ludicrous, considering we have already proven that prohibition policies don't work for a wide variety of reasons. Now it appears there may be renewed interest in rethinking our failed policy regarding this illegal herb.

From the article:

After generations of defending capital punishment and marijuana possession laws on moral, ethical and religious grounds, after years of declaring that the death penalty acted as a deterrent against violent crime and that pot smokers were more dangerous to society than, say, alcohol consumers, all of a sudden thanks to our economic crisis more and more mainstream powerbrokers are considering dramatic changes to our criminal justice system.

To read this article in its entirety, please visit the link below.


Website: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/25/opinion/...

A Xomba Account Lets You:

Read - Expand your mind. Write - Share your ideas Get Paid - Expand your pocketbook Get Started Today!


Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm not sure about heroin

I'm not sure about heroin and cocaine, honestly. Meth for sure shouldn't be legalized, since it's pure poison. You're concerns about super stoned drivers are understandable, but you're forgetting one thing: it's been proven that prohibition policies are doomed to failure. A steady supply of whatever substance the public desires will always be readily available to them whether it's legal or not. So, people smoke pot "solely to get high". Is there anything particularly wrong with that at a modest, responsible level? How many people do you know who would drink a beer or a glass of wine if it didn't contain alcohol? That would be a pretty small number, I think.

 
 

Nope

"Are you really saying you want the government involved with telling us what we can and can't ingest into our bodies?" Nope. But by that theory, should the govt legalize heroin, cocaine, etc? You wouldn't want them telling you or anyone else that they can't take those drugs, from what you've said. I'm more concerned about stoners getting high on souped-up pot and getting behind the wheel. (Yes, I know it happens all the time with alcohol. But I know plenty of people who drink who have never been drunk and have no desire to get intoxicated. On the other hand, I've never met a person who smokes pot simply because they like the taste or the smell. Except for medical marijuana, people smoke pot solely to get high.)

People have died from

People have died from alcohol poisoning, but I don't believe anyone has ever died from an overdose of marijuana. I'm not saying pot is harmless -- no drug is. I just believe that crime element associated with the criminalization of certain substances is far more detrimental to society than the substances themselves. Are you really saying you want the government involved with telling us what we can and can't ingest into our bodies?

 
 

Reasons

I would take issue that it's the "best" thing to do. And overdosing on alcohol certainly does happen, but a person has to drink a hell of a lot to get to that point, if you're talking about ODing to the point of alcohol poisoning and the need for medical attention. A lot of people would start throwing up before they consumed that much drink. Besides, overdosing is far from the only harmful effect of drugs (of all kinds).

It may be the wrong reason

It may be the wrong reason for legalizing it, but in the long run, it's certainly for the best. Yeah, today's marijuana is far more potent than it was when I was a kid. Still, it is virtually impossible to overdose on THC, as opposed to alcohol and other hard drugs.

 
 

Changing laws

simply to save money in the short term is a bad idea, in my opinion. Also, as I just commented on another post, some Dutch cities have been tightening their laws on pot, partly because the increasing amount of THC in the drug makes it more potent and seen less of a "harmless" drug. Holland also spends a lot of money related to enforcing their pot laws and preventing the spread of hard drugs, including spending on law enforcement and health care. So the whole "saving money" argument seems kind of suspect.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member