Type of Governance Should Change With Time

1. Every type of governance becomes ripe for change in 50 to 60 years, because instead of giving the desired results it starts nurturing parasites who have mastered the techniques of creating loop holes in laws and by default started controlling the system by direct or hidden channels. Also the enthusiasm of the general public in the same reduces due to clear understanding of skewed intentions and aggravating of the condition of masses by the actions of the those governing for their personal gains by rotation.

2. The type of governances that we have seen are democracy, communist ruling, monarchy, dictatorship and may be military rule. The type of governance has always been forced to change by the public after it has matured. It is probably due to the fact that the controllers/rulers have by the time learnt the tricks of the trade and started skillfully making laws and using them to their advantage and filling up their kitties without even thinking about the utility of the amassed wealth, thereby depriving the common man of his even decent share of resources and making the life living hell for him.

3. When the common man has been cornered he finally had no option but to revolt and make the people in power run for cover, finally ending in the change of governance. Otherwise no one in power wants to take note of skewed policies making the richer more rich and the poor struggling even for two square meals. The rulers do the lip service for eradication of menaces like corruption and injustice very effectively, but no stringent action to deal with the same is taken. It is because most of them are responsible for the ills and benefit from the same.

4. I being an Indian can give examples from here. In this country everyone who matters is conveniently ignorant to the facts that so called poor nation like India has maximum number of worlds richest people and their kitty is growing at a alarming pace, thereby clearly indicating that whatever India has that is also concentrated with select few and these are the fortunate ones who control everything. No body is able to see that the spread of the countries wealth should be even. On name of democracy the country can have a illiterate prime minister because no qualification is required for that job, whereas even sweepers job requires minimum qualification. Not that this doing some good to the nation, but it is convenient for the anti-social elements who are able to become so called managers of the country.

5. The problem is that no one wants to even acknowledge the problem leave alone the rectification, otherwise which government would not like know the people who have staked up the wealth abroad even when the information can be obtained. It may be because the list may contain names of those running the show in governments and opposition members because they may also be in the same boat.

6. We can keep taking examples but what is important is that let us try to do something for the country and contribute to the progress of this country, which had so many visionary leaders, who actually worked for the improvement of the down trodden selflessly and not for votes or to fill up their own kitty on the pretext of some welfare scheme.

7. Not all in power can be clubbed into this bracket, their a few countable individuals who have managed to be upright that to in this greedy and corrupt environment, everyone's heart salutes them and pray that they are able to take us further into the light.