Looks like our 2nd Amendment Rights are up for grabs as the Supreme Court is deliberating weather or not the second amendment was originally intended to allow militias to bear arms or individuals. (Funny, this wasn't questionable for over 200 years but all of a sudden, we need to clarify?) I don't think so.

If they rule to ban private gun ownership, it will be the final nail in America's coffin. You disarm the people and it will throw the gates open wide in this country to the absolute end of liberty.

You can thank gunman, Robert A. Hawkins of Nebraska for this current need for the supreme court to judge our right to bear arms. Mr. Hawkins's foolish choice to take an assault rifle and murder 9 people, including himself in an Omaha mall earlier in 2007 was covered throughout the media. However during the time that this tragedy occurred the only news outlet that reported anything about the supreme court reviewing our right to bear arms (Perhaps the most important facet to this story.) as a result of the incident was found on a BBC news website.

Sadly if you really want to read about what is going on in our country you must rely on external sources.

The next law being jammed down our throats will be the mandatory micro stamping of bullet shell casings to better track and identify whom is responsible for a shooting. Although this sounds like a good thing, I am sure that there is a second or third agenda we are not being told about.

New to Xomba? Did you enjoy what you read? Would you like to get paid by writing similar articles?

Just click the Link below and sign up, It's Free!
http://www.xomba.com/referral/7778e098

↑ Grab this Headline Animator