0
votes

Why aren't we protecting what most of us agree is our greatest treasure?

posted May 2, 2007 - 2:36pm
Why aren't we protecting what most of us agree is our greatest treasure?

I have been reading up a lot lately on gun control articles. Most of the media has been quick to sensationalize the mass murders that occurred on the Virginia Tech campus, seemingly trying to get people to fight for more gun control. People aren't stupid, though. A recent poll showed that over 70% of people still support the right for most Americans to bear arms. Why? Most of the murders that take place aren't mass-murders like that on the campuses of Virginia Tech or at Columbine. Most murders, that occur on a daily basis in many highly populated areas, (and sometimes in small communities) are homicides. A pizza delivery-man is ambushed while delivering a fake order. Would these gunmen be so bold as to do something like this if they thought he might have a weapon to defend himself? An elderly man is shot to death, with his pockets out-turned. You know that this was obviously done by a criminal, and someone who wouldn't stop at anything to get a hold of what was probably just a little bit of cash, if any at all. If the criminal(s) were met face to face with this man also holding a gun what a surprise it would be! I wonder how many criminals would pick on poor, innocent people if they thought there was even an inkling of a chance they might be met with their match. Guns can even out the score. No longer is an elderly person or a woman considered frail and weak.
This doesn't change anything, as far as I'm concerned. People are still getting killed, whether it's one person at a time or a majority of a classroom. The same types of people are killing. It isn't the average, law-abiding citizen. It's a criminal: who is willing to get his hands on a gun no matter what it takes, who doesn't care whether there is a law in the way or not. Why should we take away the law-abiding citizen's right to protect himself (or herself), while the criminals continue to get a hold of guns?
I like what Wayne LaPierre stated (an official in the NRA): "America's greatest treasures are in our schools. Yet we protect what's in our banks, our workplaces, our airports, even our malls more than we protect our children at school." I wonder how many kids, who were even thinking about bringing a gun to school (real or fake) would do so if they knew there were school officials with guns on their campus. I wonder how many upset parents would gun down teachers on a campus if there were administrators and teachers, and other sane parents that might be holding a gun. It does help that there are often peace officers on most campuses. It would also help if there were administrators (principals and assistant principals, maybe even teachers and parents, allowed to hold concealed weapons on campus). These types of people would have to be fairly bold to still target a school campus. It's obvious that they target gun-free zones.
Yes, these types of students usually have an ax to grind against other students - - usually the popular ones. Couldn't they just as easily find them at the mall, and why aren't they shooting out malls? Malls don't usually have signs posted, stating that they're a gun-free zone.
These types of parents usually have a complaint against a teacher or administrator, for holding their child back, or not letting their child get away with unruly behavior. They could just as easily follow the teacher(s) or administrators home, yet they have targeted the school campus. They would probably be less likely to get caught in a more private area, such as a residence, but they still target the schools. Again, I believe it's because schools are currently gun-free zones.
Yes, please improve the databases, so that no guns are released to those with a history of mental illness.
Yes, please keep tight regulations at schools, to keep an eye on people that are showing signs of mental illness.
Yes, close the gunshow loophole, so that gun collectors must go through the same regulations of having to background checks.
Yes, renew the assault weapons ban, so that people cannot get a hold of semiautomatics and high-capacity magazine-style weapons (only a criminal would usually want to get a hold of something like that).
But never, ever, should you take away our consitutional right to bear arms as a community of law-abiding, mentally healthy citizens.



Comments

Prohibition of Guns

I think guns are like alcohol. When we tried to limit the legality of alcohol in the 20's we had the greatest crime epidemic we have ever seen, relieved only when we decided to regulate the use of alcohol, not the ownership of the alcohol itself. I think guns are the same way. If we persist in regulating the ownership of the guns, we have misuse of of them. We need to regulate the use of guns. Guns are tools that people use. We need to regulate the use of the tool. Perhaps we would have fewer cases of the misuse of guns if we all had guns and if society promoted the proper use of them and seriously penalized their misuse. That statement tends to make one think...but what about the mentally unstable folks who would go around shooting people. Maybe if society cared more for the individuals in it and we all cared more about each other, we would not have as many crazy, miserable people. Just a thought

I agree, jclewis, with much

I agree, jclewis, with much of what you wrote here. I am part of the 70% that you cited who are in favor of our Second Amendment rights. But you lost me a little at the end of your article. "Yes, please improve the databases, so that no guns are released to those with a history of mental illness." In order for there to be a "database" that can be checked at the time of a purchase, we would have to subject all records of every mental illness patient into a government site that can be accessed by the average business owner. This means a public database would contain private medical files for millions of citizens. I don't think I need to go into detail what a problem and potential consequences that would create, not to mention a violation of many laws. "Yes, please keep tight regulations at schools, to keep an eye on people that are showing signs of mental illness." How would you distinguish what a mental illness is among teenagers and college students? With the amount of contrasting personalities in a school setting it's hard enough to determine whether a shy, quiet kid or a rambunctious troublemaker have mental problems. But even if it was known that a person does have a mental illness, how would you stop them once they decide to act out their aggression? "Yes, renew the assault weapons ban, so that people cannot get a hold of semiautomatics and high-capacity magazine-style weapons (only a criminal would usually want to get a hold of something like that)." This is along the same line of thinking that the anti-gun advocates use to ban all firearms. Criminals are going to get an assault weapon if they really want one, whether it's banned or not. Banning them so that law-abiding citizens can't acquire them allows the criminals the ability to gain the upper hand in any confrontation with another citizen. And to say that usually only criminals want them is a completely misinformed stereotype, as most gun crimes are committed with handguns and many responsible, law-abiding citizens own and use semi-automatic assault weapons for a variety of reasons. I am about to purchase one and my criminal record is spotless and I have no intention of using it in any illegal way. Guns are not, and never will be the problem. The problem is with the people using them illegally and society's unwillingness to address the facts about legal gun ownership and its relation to crime rates, including the stories of armed citizens preventing criminals with weapons from carrying out their plots. Too many people do not want to exercise their right to defend themselves in any situation and would rather have someone else to blame for not taking action instead of themselves.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member