0
votes

Why The Bible Shouldn't Be Banned

posted October 15, 2008 - 12:15pm
Why The Bible Shouldn't Be Banned

The Bible is comprised of 2 testaments, 66 different books, 1189 chapters, 31123 verses, and 773692 words. The different books of the Bible cover different topics and were addressed to different audiences. The books of the Bible were by approximately 1500 years over a period of approximately 1500 years.

The Bible is banned in public schools. It is banned because it has examples of sex, filth,incest, perversion and violence.

In Genesis 4:1 it reads: " And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived" That is the first sexual intercourse mentioned in the Bible. The Bible also makes a suggestion of killing Homosexuals. In Leviticus 20:13 it reads " If a man lies with male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.
The Bible teaches more good than bad, though. It has more positive than negative. The Bible talks about peace. In John 14:27 it reads: "I am leaving you with a gift-peace of mind and heart. And the peace I give is a gift the world cannot give, so don't be troubled or afraid." Something this world could use is just a little peace.
The Bible also talks about honesty and integrity, something that seems to be in short supply these days. Daniels faithful and honest lifestyle made him stand apart from everyone. More people should be wanting to stand apart like Daniel did. Therefore, if the Bible is not banned it has a better chance of teaching children the positive it has to offer.
Even though the Bible is banned, the reasons for it being banned are still going to be a reality in this world. At the same time, the good of the Bible is becoming more and more extinct. The negative of Bible is already happening in the world. The good of it is at low supply. The Bible shouldn't be banned, period.


Tags:

Comments

@jdubhub-ELvis T--Remember When School WAS Just Somethin to Do?

Sure, for me that was preschool--"Mommy, can I go to school today?"--and about halfway through the first grade it 'dawned on me' that you HAVE to go to school (every weekday for 12+ years) to prove yourself (or somethin`). How can America get back to the time when school was somethin` you did "when you felt like it," like getting a job when you own the gold-mine? ---Uncle MythMan & we Xombies Enlighten You on Money, Love, God etc. Turn Xombie & Help! & LinkBrander will help you 'feast on the Internet Brains'!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

@ElvisT: Granted, but there are other venues for socialization

At least here in California, it isn't like homeschooled kids live in a farmhouse hundreds of miles from the nearest neighbors. Indeed, the get-to-the-point nature and pacing of the tailored curriculum allows for a shorter school day and more opportunities for participating in local programs with peers, church groups, and even just playing in the park. I've found that parents who homeschool have more time to socialize as parents, too, and compare notes because each parent realizes that they can lean on each other for support. If you look at the skills--the real skills--that a child needs to learn to be a well-adjusted adult, such as conflict resolution, there are many more opportunities available without the distractions and drama that are the hallmarks of any public school education. I will grant you that the situation here in the States is different than in Britain, but I am a firm believer in "if there is a will, there is a way." DO YOU HAVE THE WRITE STUFF?

@jos.h--You're Right; Our Automatons will Malfunction under TMI!

'Be at the big Book-Bonfire! Destroy all literature but that on the state-approved list! All the 'free thought' of living "under God" will "water down the issue" of raising our children to serve their Next Dubya!' ---Uncle MythMan & we Xombies Enlighten You on Money, Love, God etc. Turn Xombie & Help! & LinkBrander will help you 'feast on the Internet Brains'!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

S Levels and A Levels

Hi Elvis Not sure how your experience makes you think the system needs better teachers. You describe what sounds like one of your favourite teachers as an eccentric who wanted students to become questioning active researchers. You also say 95% of the class didn't care. Put those together and I suspect your geography teacher probably wouldn't get through the current teacher training treadmill with its focus on the curriculum and passing exams. I have seen exams change dramatically from when I was a student to becoming a teacher. A levels were once global gold standard of exams. When I was a kid I looked into going to MIT and found that with my A levels I could skip the first year of a degree. The US SATS were dead easy - apart from the slightly strange use of American English in the language paper which needed some practice. Anyway, the point is that A levels once demanded an in-depth knowledge in a narrow range of subjects, whereas now one needs a cursory knowledge of the whole curriculum and the keywords for each topic. Dull to learn and dull to teach, frankly. Before, one had a choice of which questions to answer so that if you knew in detail, say a dozen topics, then you could do well. I still remember breezing through the Physics paper having completely ignored the optics syllabus - can't do that anymore, apart from the fact there is no optics any more. The only solution I see is to bring back the S level papers, some of which do still exist, and have the S level style more akin to the old S level (and A level) where the student can show off what they enjoy learning. http://www.xomba.com/why_so_much_education_rubbish Money for your Thoughts - join now OWO-BV

Home schoolng isn't the answer, but something does need to chang

This is mainly in response to JD's comment on home schooling being the answer I can agree with you on some points Jd, In Britain at least out GCSE and A level system is a sham. I took Biology, Physics and Geography at Full A level, and in Biology and physics we where being taught how to pass the exam, not the subject. To the point where entire lessons would be centered around the teacher telling us what questions we might get, based on the questions normally asked and the questions that had been asked over the previous years. Pnly my geography teacher, a moderate eccentric actually believed in education. He gave us only the bare minimum information in class, we had to make our own notes when watching videos or other forms of education, and where frequently given piles and piles of photocopied sheets from text books with the line "Read them if you want to learn. If you don't then why did you pick this subject?" He also did something most other teachers baulk at: He told us his opinions, and he encouraged us to form our own opinions. He tried to teach us to question things and learn about them, then decide if what we where told was fact or not. Sometimes entire lessons would be 'wasted' as a debate flared up between me, him and the one or two other people in the class who actually wanted to be there. Debates on topics ranging from 'Is Climate change actually a man made phenomenon?" or "What is the cause of problems in the middle east?" He didn't want to contribute to the drone factory, and it's a shame that 95% of the class just thought it was funny they could get away without doing any work. Basically JD, I agree that the school system is screwed, but home schooling would cause children to miss out on a lot of important social lessons, such as bullying, making friends, learning who to trust, a degree of self reliance, and possibly most importantly- making mistakes and dealing with them. I had to learn all these life lessons in school, and I don't think I would have learned them schooled at home as I used to live in a backwater village where the entire population where chavs. The solution is simply better teachers who try to engage and interest pupils, and a movement towards a more university style education where much of the research is done independently. And incidentally, The bible shouldn't be banned, but at the same time I want books such as Zen Buddhism: Selected Writings. D.T. Suzuki, released as well. Free religion means they all have rights. -Evis T From the keyboard of a madman.

From the keyboard of a madman.

Side-stepping the responsibility owed children is unacceptable

Rhetoric is all your saying mythman. Don't try and side-step the issue you are responding to. Your rhetoric of trying to water-down the point I was making is, at best, adding additional lunacy to the belief to continue to discourage rather than encourage. ____________ It does matter what you believe, but, what you believe does not matter if you do not act upon your beliefs. you can not vote on the truth --Pope John Paul II, 1995

 Visit: "Along The Merry Way..." - Good Reading Every Day  

 

Amen & Amen Brother Jd.--Shut-Down the Conveyer-Belt & Sow Truth

As George Carlin says, '"The Owners of our country" don't want "citizens who live the intelligent life," they want "obedient workers"---people who are smart enough to push the buttons their s`posta push, but too dumb to carry on a meaningful conversation about how badly they're gettin` screwed!' That's why Napoleon Hill points out the distinct difference between 'education' and 'schooling.' Sure, a ~little~ schooling is necessary to develop the skills that make us each 'compatible/accessible' to each other via the economy; but the 'education' is entirely up to each of us individually---the very meaning of the word is 'producing from within.' Now I see why Hill states that "the main problem with schooling today is: that it is FREE." I mean, after the "reading and writing and `rith-me-tic," you're most of SCHOOL IS A WASTE OF TIME (especially if 'time is money' ... how much does your grade-school owe you?) ---Uncle MythMan & we Xombies Enlighten You on Money, Love, God etc. Turn Xombie & Help! & LinkBrander will help you 'feast on the Internet Brains'!

---when You Join Xomba, you can join this- and MythMan's other-hot discussions!

And, thank God, the bible is banned...

Religions are no different than our current school systems. Out dated teachings and practices have discouraged children and young people for years. We're all long overdue, and shame on all of us, for not standing up and aiding "encouragement." Encouragement must replace "discouragement" in the practice of education. And, back to the Bible -- thank God for the separation of church and state.

 Visit: "Along The Merry Way..." - Good Reading Every Day  

 

explosive bible

I didn't realise bibles were banned in US public schools. Very funny, considering how many millions of bibles the USA produces to distribute to the poor un-christians of the world. Do you have religious education classes in schools? Guess that's why ID propagandists want to smuggle christianity into the science classes. The reasons for the ban seem laughable, though, like kids are gonna learn about sex from the bible when they have soft porn celebrities to drool over. Keep the ban. Give the bibles to those in the third world short of burning material. Money for your Thoughts - join now OWO-BV

Only, schools are not there to educate children

Schools exist to indoctrinate our children and make them good little conformist citizens. The curriculum is designed to take away freedom of thought through rote exercise and memorization. By the time the child graduates high school, if he or she even graduates, the child will have enough background to immediately go into the unskilled or semi-skilled workforce, be fodder for the military (which is what I did), or be pushed into the next phase of the corporate indoctrination ladder: in college pursuing a BS bachelor's degree. A bachelor's degree is only slightly better than a high school diploma anymore. The solution is a return to homeschooling, where the parents or parent teaching group can instill both moral principles and a real education in their children. Many places require an annual scholastic test to ensure that the child is keeping pace with his or her peers, but that is hardly ever a problem because homeschooling is tailored to the child. Part of the uproar over homeschooling is that the child turns 18 with a far superior education and the ability to think for himself or herself, which is an anathema to a conformist society of good little citizens and workers. The one question that the advocates of public indoctrination systems cannot seem to ever answer is why our "one remaining superpower" country cannot compete in the international marketplace because the children graduating from public schools lack the educational achievements of even some of the poorer countries in the world. DO YOU HAVE THE WRITE STUFF?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <b> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <span> <object> <param> <embed> <table> <tr> <td> <div>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member