Somebody pinch me. Am I in a parallel universe where the truth sometimes gets told by the leading purveyors of misinformation?

First, during the U.S. Presidential campaign, righty meat head Bill O'Reilly had a moment of clarity and blamed the economy on the Republicans & Bush; and now a new peer review study published by the American Medical Association is finally admitting (to the fact that has been reported for decades in the alternative health community,) that mammograms cause breast cancer.

Opponents of the procedure have often remarked at the utter insanity of placing breast tissue which often has tiny & benign cysts into what can only be described as industrial vice clamps, thus popping the cysts while simultaneously exposing them to close-up radiation.

This study doesn't speak to those logistics, but it does point out some impossible-to-sweep-under-the-rug breast cancer rate correlations that demonstrate how the cancer increases when countries start to adapt the mammogram screening protocol.

In a previous Xombyte months ago, I listed about two dozen links to independent sources and studies that came to the same conclusion. I could have listed much more, but it felt like I was bordering on overkill, so I left it at that. It's a violation of Xomba.com terms to link one Xomba entry to another specific entry, but if you're interested, just Google,
'mammograms cause breast cancer' and prepare to read for several hours.

You will find some denials, but the evidence
is undeniable if your mind is open and you're not trying to protect a vested interest. (Many times the most powerful vested interest is protecting your belief system.)

Among some of the more controversial positions in the alternative health community is that more times than not, a person with cancer would do better simply to do nothing, than to subject themselves to Western (allopathic) cancer treatment. (And that most cancer deaths are cancer treatment deaths, which come about much sooner and with more suffering.)
Of course, they go on to say, rather than do nothing, we should practice holistic treatment and prevention.

The interesting thing here, is in this study, the above
controversial postulatiion is very much hinted at. It indicates that interpretation of the evidence indicates that many women evidently get breast cancer and are naturally healed of it, without even knowing it. (I'd venture to say, this isn't limited to women or the breast area.) Now imagine if these people had been alerted to the cancer. How many needless mastectomies would have been performed? How many pointless chemo routines endured? Of those, how many would have died from the treatment?

Nobody is saying to be oblivious. Proper education & employment of the self exam, backed up by periodic professional exams is fine. And here is where the other "C"- word must be addressed. Conspiracy. There are technologies that screen more effectively for breast cancer without dong any harm, yet they have yet to be accepted. Gee, I wonder why?

If you are offended with the implication that the medical industry, especially at the top levels, would create systems, procedures and protocols that suppress prevention and cures while increasing their bottom line, then I only have two words for you:

Grow up.

----------------------------------------------------

Question: What detox product was shown in a clinical study to cause spontaneous regression in 85% of Stage 4 cancer patients 1 year later?

Answer: Click Here

-------------------------------------------------

$5000 No Credit Check Vacation Financing Plus Built In Residual Income Opportunity Click Here