Technosaurus's Xombytes

Turtles and crocodilians no longer reptiles

0
points

My introductory biology course taught that living four-legged vertebrates are divided into four classes: amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles. This has been viewed as problematic for awhile now because birds have been shown to be the closest living relatives of crocodilians. There has been a question of what to do with them as a result. Do we just leave well enough alone and keep everything paraphyletic? Or do we try to attempt to create more natural groups by putting birds and crocodilians closer to each other in their own class or putting birds into Reptilia?

The Center of North American Taxonomy (CNAH) seems to think they have an answer. They've recently revised their modern taxonomy and come up with a solution that probably will surprise a lot of people.




11-year-old boy finds original jaw bone of dinosaur

0
points

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-08/03/content_8925813.htm
http://diariodigital.sapo.pt/news.asp?section_id=13&id_news=343287

Potentially great story, young Jacob Walen finds a theropod dinosaur bone in Portugal 5 years ago. But do we get to see any photos of it? Not for but one crap one at the end. Instead we get mostly pictures of a blond haired kid next to a reconstructed skull mount in a museum. How incredibly boring!




Giant salamanders of the world

0
points

I recently skimmed this article on about hellbenders in Allegheny Co., Maryland. I had planned initially on looking up more about these, but I dallied about, and never got around to it.

It caught back up with me in the last few days of my summer biology course when the instructor actually mentioned hellbenders himself... So I found myself finally getting around to looking up more on them.

Japanese giant salamander

Image via Wikipedia




Dissection of fear-mongering

0
points

I saw this article on National Geographic's Web page yesterday, and I revisited it tonight as I wrote this Xomblurb.

Though the entire article is pretty bubblegum and plays up the Doomsday angle, let's look past all the B.S. and draw the truth from it-



Rejection of Evolution Linked to Misunderstanding

1
point

Larry Ingels recently wrote a letter to the editor in the Free Lance Star rejecting evolution based on an interesting claim.

He writes, "You cannot build such complex systems by starting with a single cell and using natural selection or mutations to increase their complexity".

Of course, as Mr. Ingels states himself, he is relying on Michael Behe, a biochemist popular among creationists for his views of the "irreducible complexity" of certain biological systems which he cannot possibly see as having been the product of evolution. Unfortunately, Behe's argument (and as a result, Ingels' as well) is flawed.